Abstract 1119P
Background
The classification of stage III melanoma has significantly changed in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th version (AJCC v8). Besides including four new substages, AJCC v8 defines that lymph nodes (LN) with metastatic tumor cells, regardless of the size and the technic used to identify it, should be considered tumor-involved LN. This implies that even thin melanomas with isolated tumor cells (ic) in LN will be classified as stage IIIA, potentially upstaging patients (pts) with good prognosis.
Methods
Patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed with stage I-III between 2000-2020 at the Centre of Dermatooncology, University-Hospital of Tuebingen, were included. A cohort of stage IIIA (ic) pts from the DeCOG trial was used as a validation cohort. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Data on pts and tumor characteristics will also be presented.
Results
The Tuebingen cohort included 106 pts with stage IIIA (ic) and 132 pts with stage IIIA with a LN metastasis >0.1 mm (from now on stage IIIA). The validation cohort from the DeCOG trial consisted of 39 pts with melanoma IIIA (ic) and 104 pts with stage IIIA. The median follow-up (mFU) for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA in the CMMR cohort was 64 and 60 months (95% CI 34-97 and 35-106), respectively. The mFU for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA in the DeCOG cohort was 64 and 62 months (95%CI 47-95 and 37-86), respectively. In the Tuebingen cohort, 10y RFS rates for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA were 82% (95% CI 72-92) and 48% (95% CI 38-58), respectively (p<0.001). The 10y DMFS rates for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA were 87% (95% CI 79-96) and 55% (95% CI 44-66), respectively; (p<0.001). In the DeCOG cohort, 10y RFS for stage IIIA (ic) and stage IIIA were 88% (95% CI 77-99) and 35% (95% CI 7-62), respectively; (p=0.009). The 10y DMFS for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA was 88% (95% CI 77-99) and 60% (95% CI 39-80), respectively (p=0.061).
Conclusions
AJCCv8 Stage IIIA (ic) melanoma has a prognosis similar to stage IB, statistically significantly better than Stage IIIA. LN with isolated tumor cells should not be considered tumor-involved LN, and this should be reviewed in the new AJCC edition.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
T.M.S. Amaral: Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagement: CeCaVa; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Novartis, Neracare, Sanofi, Skyline-Dx; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, iFIT; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: IO Biotech, MSD, University Hospital, Essen, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Unicancer; Non-Financial Interests, Member: Portuguese Society for Medical Oncology, ASCO; Other, Clinical expert: INFARMED. R. Stadler: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Kyowa Kirin, Stemline, 4SC. A. Forschner: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Pierre Fabre, Novartis, MSD, BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Immunocore, Pierre Fabre, MSD, BMS, Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS Stiftung Immunonkologie; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodation, Expenses: Pierre Fabre, Novartis. L. Flatz: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Hookipa Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Novartis, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, Philogen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Hookipa Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: Hookipa Pharma. C. Garbe: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: CeCaVa, Novartis, NeraCare, BMS, Philogen, Roche, Sanofi, MSD. U. Leiter-Stoppke: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Allmiral Hermal, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel support: Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Allmiral Hermal, Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Board member: ADO (DECOG). All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1109P - Second-line pembrolizumab (pembro) in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Long-term follow-up of the phase I KEYNOTE-151 study
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster session 13
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13