Abstract 1119P
Background
The classification of stage III melanoma has significantly changed in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th version (AJCC v8). Besides including four new substages, AJCC v8 defines that lymph nodes (LN) with metastatic tumor cells, regardless of the size and the technic used to identify it, should be considered tumor-involved LN. This implies that even thin melanomas with isolated tumor cells (ic) in LN will be classified as stage IIIA, potentially upstaging patients (pts) with good prognosis.
Methods
Patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed with stage I-III between 2000-2020 at the Centre of Dermatooncology, University-Hospital of Tuebingen, were included. A cohort of stage IIIA (ic) pts from the DeCOG trial was used as a validation cohort. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Data on pts and tumor characteristics will also be presented.
Results
The Tuebingen cohort included 106 pts with stage IIIA (ic) and 132 pts with stage IIIA with a LN metastasis >0.1 mm (from now on stage IIIA). The validation cohort from the DeCOG trial consisted of 39 pts with melanoma IIIA (ic) and 104 pts with stage IIIA. The median follow-up (mFU) for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA in the CMMR cohort was 64 and 60 months (95% CI 34-97 and 35-106), respectively. The mFU for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA in the DeCOG cohort was 64 and 62 months (95%CI 47-95 and 37-86), respectively. In the Tuebingen cohort, 10y RFS rates for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA were 82% (95% CI 72-92) and 48% (95% CI 38-58), respectively (p<0.001). The 10y DMFS rates for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA were 87% (95% CI 79-96) and 55% (95% CI 44-66), respectively; (p<0.001). In the DeCOG cohort, 10y RFS for stage IIIA (ic) and stage IIIA were 88% (95% CI 77-99) and 35% (95% CI 7-62), respectively; (p=0.009). The 10y DMFS for stage IIIA (ic) and IIIA was 88% (95% CI 77-99) and 60% (95% CI 39-80), respectively (p=0.061).
Conclusions
AJCCv8 Stage IIIA (ic) melanoma has a prognosis similar to stage IB, statistically significantly better than Stage IIIA. LN with isolated tumor cells should not be considered tumor-involved LN, and this should be reviewed in the new AJCC edition.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
T.M.S. Amaral: Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagement: CeCaVa; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Novartis, Neracare, Sanofi, Skyline-Dx; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, iFIT; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: IO Biotech, MSD, University Hospital, Essen, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Unicancer; Non-Financial Interests, Member: Portuguese Society for Medical Oncology, ASCO; Other, Clinical expert: INFARMED. R. Stadler: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Kyowa Kirin, Stemline, 4SC. A. Forschner: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Pierre Fabre, Novartis, MSD, BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Immunocore, Pierre Fabre, MSD, BMS, Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS Stiftung Immunonkologie; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodation, Expenses: Pierre Fabre, Novartis. L. Flatz: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Hookipa Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Novartis, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, Philogen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Hookipa Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: Hookipa Pharma. C. Garbe: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: CeCaVa, Novartis, NeraCare, BMS, Philogen, Roche, Sanofi, MSD. U. Leiter-Stoppke: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Allmiral Hermal, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel support: Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Allmiral Hermal, Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Board member: ADO (DECOG). All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1120P - Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model to predict recurrence-free survival and melanoma-specific survival in patients with melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy
Presenter: Robert Stassen
Session: Poster session 13
1121P - Interferon-gamma (IFNy) gene signature as a predictive biomarker for response in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) low advanced melanoma patients
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1122P - Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and systemic inflammatory index as prognostic biomarkers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune checkpoint inhibitors: Could any of them be used?
Presenter: Maria Menezes
Session: Poster session 13
1123P - Baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to immune checkpoint inhibition in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Mark Schuiveling
Session: Poster session 13
1124P - IL-6 as prognostic factor in adjuvant or metastatic skin cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: A deep biomarker analysis
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster session 13
1125P - Identification of a subset of metastatic melanoma patients demonstrating germline determined insensitivity to immunotherapy
Presenter: Benjamin Fairfax
Session: Poster session 13
1126P - REtrospective Study of definitive therapy for head and neck mUcosal MElanoma: The RESUME study
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster session 13
1127P - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced mucosal melanoma (MM): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: James Pham
Session: Poster session 13
1128P - A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of FHD-286, a novel BRG1/BRM (SMARCA4/SMARCA2) inhibitor, for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Sapna Patel
Session: Poster session 13
1129P - Effect of subsequent therapies including checkpoint inhibitors on overall survival in a phase III randomized trial of tebentafusp in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma: Long-term follow-up
Presenter: Marlana Orloff
Session: Poster session 13