Abstract 1197P
Background
Non-functioning, sporadic, G1-G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors usually display an indolent course. Surgery is the first-choice treatment for localized tumors >2 cm. Unresectable or metastatic PanNETs expressing somatostatin receptors are treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). The PROMID and the CLARINET studies proved the SSA antiproliferative effect in advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The standard treatment for patients with PanNETs ≤2cm is active surveillance. Yet no evidence of the value of SSA treatment exist in such patient population.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data from 72 patients with sporadic non-functioning G1-G2 PanNETs≤2cm, 31 treated with somatostatin analogs and 41 underwent to active surveillance at our Institution. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and response rate (RR) were analyzed in SSA group and AS group. Survival was described by the Kaplan-Meier method with Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test. Cox-regression analysis was used to assess, both singularly and collectively, the weight of clinically relevant covariates on survival outcomes. Statistical significance was declared at two-sided p<0.05.
Results
At a median follow-up of 53.7 months, the median progression free survival was not reached in the treatment group versus an estimated PFS of 85 months in the control group (HR 0.11, p = 0.01), with a rate of progression or death up to 21.9% in the active surveillance group. Further, in the group of patients treated with somatostatin analogs response rate was 16.1% with one complete response.
Conclusions
Our monocentric experience demonstrated a significant antiproliferative activity of somatostatin analogs in patients with sporadic, non-functionating G1-G2 PanNETs ≤2cm delaying tumor progression and distant spread in small lesions that sometimes may reveal an unpredictable aggressiveness.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1100P - Open-label non-randomized phase IB study to characterize the safety, tolerability and recommended dose of tinostamustin in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma (ENIGMA)
Presenter: Markus Joerger
Session: Poster session 13
1101P - The effect of LNS8801 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with treatment-refractory cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Jordi Rodon
Session: Poster session 13
1102P - Evaluation of surrogate endpoints for overall survival within the RELATIVITY-047 trial
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster session 13
1103P - Nivolumab (NIVO) plus relatlimab (RELA) vs NIVO in previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma: 2-year subgroup analyses from RELATIVITY-047
Presenter: Georgina Long
Session: Poster session 13
1104P - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic or non-resectable melanoma after failure of adjuvant anti-PD1 treatment: A EUMelareg real-world evidence study
Presenter: Michael Weichenthal
Session: Poster session 13
1105P - First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients previously treated with adjuvant systemic therapy
Presenter: Katarzyna Kozak
Session: Poster session 13
1106P - Anti-PD-1 (PD1) monotherapy or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 for metastatic melanoma (MM) patients (pts) with liver metastases (mets)
Presenter: Ines Pires da Silva
Session: Poster session 13
1107P - BRAF mutation status does not impact outcomes with tebentafusp in advanced cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Alexander Shoushtari
Session: Poster session 13
1108P - Outcomes of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma after cessation of immunotherapy following complete response or toxicities
Presenter: Nur Sakinah Zulkifli
Session: Poster session 13