Abstract 1197P
Background
Non-functioning, sporadic, G1-G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors usually display an indolent course. Surgery is the first-choice treatment for localized tumors >2 cm. Unresectable or metastatic PanNETs expressing somatostatin receptors are treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). The PROMID and the CLARINET studies proved the SSA antiproliferative effect in advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The standard treatment for patients with PanNETs ≤2cm is active surveillance. Yet no evidence of the value of SSA treatment exist in such patient population.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data from 72 patients with sporadic non-functioning G1-G2 PanNETs≤2cm, 31 treated with somatostatin analogs and 41 underwent to active surveillance at our Institution. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and response rate (RR) were analyzed in SSA group and AS group. Survival was described by the Kaplan-Meier method with Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test. Cox-regression analysis was used to assess, both singularly and collectively, the weight of clinically relevant covariates on survival outcomes. Statistical significance was declared at two-sided p<0.05.
Results
At a median follow-up of 53.7 months, the median progression free survival was not reached in the treatment group versus an estimated PFS of 85 months in the control group (HR 0.11, p = 0.01), with a rate of progression or death up to 21.9% in the active surveillance group. Further, in the group of patients treated with somatostatin analogs response rate was 16.1% with one complete response.
Conclusions
Our monocentric experience demonstrated a significant antiproliferative activity of somatostatin analogs in patients with sporadic, non-functionating G1-G2 PanNETs ≤2cm delaying tumor progression and distant spread in small lesions that sometimes may reveal an unpredictable aggressiveness.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1170P - Survival outcome prediction of primary melanoma tumours from histology images using deep learning
Presenter: Céline Bossard
Session: Poster session 13
1171P - Evaluation of the transcriptomic presence of tumor associated antigens (TAAs) from antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and PD-L1 in melanoma: Options for new clinical opportunities
Presenter: Jorge Bartolome
Session: Poster session 13
1172P - Analysis of the microbiome of metastatic melanoma patients with complete response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Marin Golcic
Session: Poster session 13
1173P - NRAS mutation as an independent prognostic factor for resectable Chinese acral melanoma
Presenter: Yu Xu
Session: Poster session 13
1174P - Sex differences in advanced melanoma in Spain: Results from the prospective real-world study GEM 1801
Presenter: Eva Muñoz Couselo
Session: Poster session 13
1175P - Return to work after neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma patients
Presenter: Judith Lijnsvelt
Session: Poster session 13
1176P - Planned drug holidays during immunotherapy in advanced and metastatic melanoma patients: A nation-wide study
Presenter: Anna Czarnecka
Session: Poster session 13
1177P - Assessment of tumour burden reduction per photography vs magnetic resonance imaging in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma receiving sonidegib 200 mg
Presenter: Ralf Gutzmer
Session: Poster session 13
1178P - Melanoma incidence rises for pediatrics: 15-year nationwide retrospective cohort study in Korea (2004-2019)
Presenter: Jisu Oh
Session: Poster session 13
1179P - The underestimated skin cancer risk after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis of 147154 patients
Presenter: Amr Ehab El-Qushayri
Session: Poster session 13