Abstract 1197P
Background
Non-functioning, sporadic, G1-G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors usually display an indolent course. Surgery is the first-choice treatment for localized tumors >2 cm. Unresectable or metastatic PanNETs expressing somatostatin receptors are treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). The PROMID and the CLARINET studies proved the SSA antiproliferative effect in advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The standard treatment for patients with PanNETs ≤2cm is active surveillance. Yet no evidence of the value of SSA treatment exist in such patient population.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data from 72 patients with sporadic non-functioning G1-G2 PanNETs≤2cm, 31 treated with somatostatin analogs and 41 underwent to active surveillance at our Institution. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and response rate (RR) were analyzed in SSA group and AS group. Survival was described by the Kaplan-Meier method with Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test. Cox-regression analysis was used to assess, both singularly and collectively, the weight of clinically relevant covariates on survival outcomes. Statistical significance was declared at two-sided p<0.05.
Results
At a median follow-up of 53.7 months, the median progression free survival was not reached in the treatment group versus an estimated PFS of 85 months in the control group (HR 0.11, p = 0.01), with a rate of progression or death up to 21.9% in the active surveillance group. Further, in the group of patients treated with somatostatin analogs response rate was 16.1% with one complete response.
Conclusions
Our monocentric experience demonstrated a significant antiproliferative activity of somatostatin analogs in patients with sporadic, non-functionating G1-G2 PanNETs ≤2cm delaying tumor progression and distant spread in small lesions that sometimes may reveal an unpredictable aggressiveness.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1129P - Effect of subsequent therapies including checkpoint inhibitors on overall survival in a phase III randomized trial of tebentafusp in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma: Long-term follow-up
Presenter: Marlana Orloff
Session: Poster session 13
1130P - Tebentafusp (tebe) in an ongoing cohort of 72 French patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM)
Presenter: Leah Mailly-Giacchetti
Session: Poster session 13
1131P - Management of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) patients on tebentafusp in a real-world setting
Presenter: Mauricio Fernando Ribeiro
Session: Poster session 13
1132P - Chemokine expression in uveal melanoma and association with tumor genetics and response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Aparna Nallagangula
Session: Poster session 13
1133P - SF3B1 mutation predicts improved overall survival in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: Molecular and clinical correlates
Presenter: Luis del Carpio Huerta
Session: Poster session 13
1134P - Safety and efficacy of low dose (LD) ipilimumab (Ipi) + pembrolizumab (pem) in checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) naïve patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM)
Presenter: Isabella Glitza
Session: Poster session 13
1135P - Comparison of intracranial (IC) response assessment criteria in patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with combination nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) in CheckMate 204
Presenter: Raymond Huang
Session: Poster session 13
1136P - Regorafenib combined with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors for the treatment of refractory melanoma brain metastases
Presenter: Iris Dirven
Session: Poster session 13
1138P - Intralesional administration of L19IL2/L19TNF in difficult-to-treat non-melanoma skin cancer shows a favorable safety profile and preliminary clinical activity
Presenter: Lukas Flatz
Session: Poster session 13