Abstract 1197P
Background
Non-functioning, sporadic, G1-G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors usually display an indolent course. Surgery is the first-choice treatment for localized tumors >2 cm. Unresectable or metastatic PanNETs expressing somatostatin receptors are treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). The PROMID and the CLARINET studies proved the SSA antiproliferative effect in advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The standard treatment for patients with PanNETs ≤2cm is active surveillance. Yet no evidence of the value of SSA treatment exist in such patient population.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data from 72 patients with sporadic non-functioning G1-G2 PanNETs≤2cm, 31 treated with somatostatin analogs and 41 underwent to active surveillance at our Institution. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and response rate (RR) were analyzed in SSA group and AS group. Survival was described by the Kaplan-Meier method with Mantel-Haenszel log-rank test. Cox-regression analysis was used to assess, both singularly and collectively, the weight of clinically relevant covariates on survival outcomes. Statistical significance was declared at two-sided p<0.05.
Results
At a median follow-up of 53.7 months, the median progression free survival was not reached in the treatment group versus an estimated PFS of 85 months in the control group (HR 0.11, p = 0.01), with a rate of progression or death up to 21.9% in the active surveillance group. Further, in the group of patients treated with somatostatin analogs response rate was 16.1% with one complete response.
Conclusions
Our monocentric experience demonstrated a significant antiproliferative activity of somatostatin analogs in patients with sporadic, non-functionating G1-G2 PanNETs ≤2cm delaying tumor progression and distant spread in small lesions that sometimes may reveal an unpredictable aggressiveness.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1139P - Final results of a phase II study of pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCCs)
Presenter: Eve Maubec
Session: Poster session 13
1140P - Cemiplimab versus historical systemic treatments for locally advanced (la) or metastatic (m) cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCC): Results from the French study TOSCA
Presenter: Emilie Gerard
Session: Poster session 13
1141P - Early discontinuation of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Elena Croce
Session: Poster session 13
1142P - Personalized decision making in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Integrating a clinico-pathological model for absolute metastatic risk into the staging systems
Presenter: Marlies Wakkee
Session: Poster session 13
1143P - Changes in peripheral and local tumor immunity after cemiplimab treatment early describe clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Daniela Esposito
Session: Poster session 13
1144P - High-plex spatial profiling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to identify biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes: The cMIC study
Presenter: Rahul Ladwa
Session: Poster session 13
1145P - Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) treated with avelumab: Analysis of a prospective German MCC registry (MCC TRIM)
Presenter: Juergen Becker
Session: Poster session 13
1146P - Updated results from POD1UM-201: A phase II study of retifanlimab in patients with advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)
Presenter: Giovanni Grignani
Session: Poster session 13
1148P - Avelumab as second-line or later (2L+) treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC): Real-world tx patterns in France
Presenter: Astrid Blom Fily
Session: Poster session 13