Abstract 1744P
Background
Patients with colon cancer from more deprived areas may face barriers to accessing timely, quality healthcare. These barriers may contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in survival. We examined differences in treatment and time to diagnosis and treatment between socioeconomic groups.
Methods
The English Cancer Registry identified a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with colon cancer in England between 2016-2017. Cancer Registry data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, Cancer Pathway, Systematic Anti-Cancer Dataset and Diagnostic Imaging Datasets. Lasso logistic regression identified predictors of colon cancer treatment. The secondary care diagnostic interval (SCDI) was used to calculate the time to diagnosis and treatment, analysed using quantile regression. All analyses were conducted using STATA. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05185388).
Results
A total of 35,248 patients were included in the analyses. Area deprivation was a significant predictor of receipt of surgery and chemotherapy. The adjusted odds of treatment were reduced for patients from the most deprived quintile: surgery (OR 0.78), chemotherapy in stage IV (OR 0.88), and chemotherapy in stage II-III (OR 0.79). The median SCDI was 20 days for patients from the most and least deprived areas. However, patients from the most deprived area had a significantly longer time to diagnosis after adjusting for other factors (median difference 0.73 days [95% CI 0.09-1.36]). Meanwhile, the median treatment interval was 55 and 57 days for patients from the least and most deprived areas, respectively. The treatment interval was significantly longer for patients from the most, compared with the least deprived areas after adjusting for important factors (median difference 2.29 days [95% CI 1.28-3.31]).
Conclusions
In this large cohort of patients with colon cancer in England, we demonstrated that patients from more deprived areas are less likely to receive surgery or chemotherapy and wait longer to commence treatment. Further research is needed to understand why and what evidence-based actions can reduce these inequalities in treatment and timeliness.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05185388.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University of Hull.
Funding
Yorkshire Cancer Research.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1736P - Young adult lung cancer demands more attention in a low-resource area: Bangladesh perspective
Presenter: Muhammad Rafiqul Islam
Session: Poster session 23
1737P - Use of the predictive risk model LungFlagTM for lung cancer screening in screening in a Spanish reference center: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Presenter: Maria Eugenia Olmedo Garcia
Session: Poster session 23
1738P - Impact of digital platforms on exposure to tobacco and new smoking devices: A survey approach
Presenter: Diego de Haro
Session: Poster session 23
1739P - Lung cancer mortality patterns of tobacco users in the United States: A 21-year analysis (1999-2020)
Presenter: Seif Bugazia
Session: Poster session 23
1740P - Geolocation of respiratory tract cancer and its relationship with chronic exposure to PM2.5 pollutants
Presenter: Moisés González-Escamilla
Session: Poster session 23
1741P - Are physicians aware of lung cancer screening benefits and the importance of implementing this? Data from two public hospitals in Buenos Aires province, Argentina
Presenter: Valentin Vidal
Session: Poster session 23
1742P - Gender differences in incidence trends of early-onset GI cancer: The European perspective
Presenter: Irit Ben-Aharon
Session: Poster session 23
1743P - Bridging the gender gap in oncology: GEORGiNA'S quest for equality in academic research
Presenter: Khalid El Bairi
Session: Poster session 23
1745P - Why do adult patients with cancer abandon treatment in India? A nationwide qualitative study to understand the perspectives of healthcare workers
Presenter: Reshma Ayiraveetil
Session: Poster session 23
1746P - Unintended consequences: Working time directives and oncology staff implications
Presenter: Simon Barry
Session: Poster session 23