Abstract 1744P
Background
Patients with colon cancer from more deprived areas may face barriers to accessing timely, quality healthcare. These barriers may contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in survival. We examined differences in treatment and time to diagnosis and treatment between socioeconomic groups.
Methods
The English Cancer Registry identified a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with colon cancer in England between 2016-2017. Cancer Registry data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, Cancer Pathway, Systematic Anti-Cancer Dataset and Diagnostic Imaging Datasets. Lasso logistic regression identified predictors of colon cancer treatment. The secondary care diagnostic interval (SCDI) was used to calculate the time to diagnosis and treatment, analysed using quantile regression. All analyses were conducted using STATA. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05185388).
Results
A total of 35,248 patients were included in the analyses. Area deprivation was a significant predictor of receipt of surgery and chemotherapy. The adjusted odds of treatment were reduced for patients from the most deprived quintile: surgery (OR 0.78), chemotherapy in stage IV (OR 0.88), and chemotherapy in stage II-III (OR 0.79). The median SCDI was 20 days for patients from the most and least deprived areas. However, patients from the most deprived area had a significantly longer time to diagnosis after adjusting for other factors (median difference 0.73 days [95% CI 0.09-1.36]). Meanwhile, the median treatment interval was 55 and 57 days for patients from the least and most deprived areas, respectively. The treatment interval was significantly longer for patients from the most, compared with the least deprived areas after adjusting for important factors (median difference 2.29 days [95% CI 1.28-3.31]).
Conclusions
In this large cohort of patients with colon cancer in England, we demonstrated that patients from more deprived areas are less likely to receive surgery or chemotherapy and wait longer to commence treatment. Further research is needed to understand why and what evidence-based actions can reduce these inequalities in treatment and timeliness.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05185388.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University of Hull.
Funding
Yorkshire Cancer Research.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1706P - Time to full approval of novel anticancer medicines granted accelerated approval and implications for reform of the accelerated approval pathway
Presenter: Thomas Hwang
Session: Poster session 23
1707P - Cancer drug prices in the US: Efficacy, innovation, clinical trial evidence, and epidemiology
Presenter: Christoph Michaeli
Session: Poster session 23
1708P - The registration pathways in China for globally developed novel anticancer drugs
Presenter: Da-wei Wu
Session: Poster session 23
1709P - Influence of censoring on conclusions of FDA-approved cancer drugs using the modified time to treatment failure
Presenter: Jonathan Ofer
Session: Poster session 23
1710P - Protocol waivers and consequences on treatment safety and efficacy in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP)
Presenter: Laurien Zeverijn
Session: Poster session 23
1711P - The DRUP-like clinical trials family: A distributed European trial network for equitable access to precision medicine
Presenter: Hans Gelderblom
Session: Poster session 23
1712P - Implementation of a molecular pre-screening program (MPP) in a network of public cancer centres for phase I clinical trial (Ph1-CT) candidates: The PREICO program
Presenter: Juan José Soto Castillo
Session: Poster session 23
1713P - Non-inferiority oncology clinical trials in major journals: Purposes, methods and results
Presenter: Rafael Barreto
Session: Poster session 23
1714P - Geographical disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in Korea
Presenter: Sokbom Kang
Session: Poster session 23
1715P - Analysis of the adequacy of control arms in oncology randomized clinical trials published between 2017 and 2021: A meta-research study
Presenter: Alessandro Rossi
Session: Poster session 23