Abstract 1744P
Background
Patients with colon cancer from more deprived areas may face barriers to accessing timely, quality healthcare. These barriers may contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in survival. We examined differences in treatment and time to diagnosis and treatment between socioeconomic groups.
Methods
The English Cancer Registry identified a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with colon cancer in England between 2016-2017. Cancer Registry data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, Cancer Pathway, Systematic Anti-Cancer Dataset and Diagnostic Imaging Datasets. Lasso logistic regression identified predictors of colon cancer treatment. The secondary care diagnostic interval (SCDI) was used to calculate the time to diagnosis and treatment, analysed using quantile regression. All analyses were conducted using STATA. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05185388).
Results
A total of 35,248 patients were included in the analyses. Area deprivation was a significant predictor of receipt of surgery and chemotherapy. The adjusted odds of treatment were reduced for patients from the most deprived quintile: surgery (OR 0.78), chemotherapy in stage IV (OR 0.88), and chemotherapy in stage II-III (OR 0.79). The median SCDI was 20 days for patients from the most and least deprived areas. However, patients from the most deprived area had a significantly longer time to diagnosis after adjusting for other factors (median difference 0.73 days [95% CI 0.09-1.36]). Meanwhile, the median treatment interval was 55 and 57 days for patients from the least and most deprived areas, respectively. The treatment interval was significantly longer for patients from the most, compared with the least deprived areas after adjusting for important factors (median difference 2.29 days [95% CI 1.28-3.31]).
Conclusions
In this large cohort of patients with colon cancer in England, we demonstrated that patients from more deprived areas are less likely to receive surgery or chemotherapy and wait longer to commence treatment. Further research is needed to understand why and what evidence-based actions can reduce these inequalities in treatment and timeliness.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05185388.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University of Hull.
Funding
Yorkshire Cancer Research.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1726P - Optimizing oncology drug spending in a cancer centre in Ireland
Presenter: Ruth Kieran
Session: Poster session 23
1727P - Barriers and facilitators of physician involvement in clinical oncology database management in Ukraine
Presenter: Inesa Huivaniuk
Session: Poster session 23
1728P - Implementation of a comprehensive oncology unit: Needs detected in cancer survivors during follow-up
Presenter: Francisco J Jimenez-ruiz
Session: Poster session 23
1729P - Targeted interventions in registration and reporting of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) in oncology help to improve tumor board decisions
Presenter: Lars Galonska
Session: Poster session 23
1730P - Dealing with digital paralysis: Surviving a cyberattack in a cancer centre
Presenter: Rachel J. Keogh
Session: Poster session 23
1731P - Providing access to anticancer drugs within an armed conflict: The experience of Mission Kharkiv (MK) and Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) in Ukraine
Presenter: Stanislav Polozov
Session: Poster session 23
1732P - War and the fragility of anticancer drug supply networks in Ukraine
Presenter: Olha Kostenchak-Svystak
Session: Poster session 23
1733P - Two wars at time: Fight against cancer during war time - experience of Ukraine
Presenter: Veronika Patsko
Session: Poster session 23
1734P - Early impact of a personalized lung cancer interception program for heavy smokers
Presenter: Pamela Abdayem
Session: Poster session 23
1735P - Impact of revised US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2021 lung cancer screening guideline on long-term cancer survivors in the United States
Presenter: Qian Wang
Session: Poster session 23