Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 23

1744P - Socioeconomic inequalities in the diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer: A population-based English cancer registry study

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 23

Topics

Cancer Registries;  Cancer Care Equity Principles and Health Economics;  Cancer Prevention

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Benjamin Pickwell-Smith

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S925-S953. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01945-2

Authors

B.A. Pickwell-Smith1, L. Paton2, I. Soyiri1, M. Lind1, U. Macleod1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, HU6 7RX - Hull/GB
  • 2 Hull York Medical School, University of York, YO10 5DD - York/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1744P

Background

Patients with colon cancer from more deprived areas may face barriers to accessing timely, quality healthcare. These barriers may contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in survival. We examined differences in treatment and time to diagnosis and treatment between socioeconomic groups.

Methods

The English Cancer Registry identified a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with colon cancer in England between 2016-2017. Cancer Registry data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, Cancer Pathway, Systematic Anti-Cancer Dataset and Diagnostic Imaging Datasets. Lasso logistic regression identified predictors of colon cancer treatment. The secondary care diagnostic interval (SCDI) was used to calculate the time to diagnosis and treatment, analysed using quantile regression. All analyses were conducted using STATA. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05185388).

Results

A total of 35,248 patients were included in the analyses. Area deprivation was a significant predictor of receipt of surgery and chemotherapy. The adjusted odds of treatment were reduced for patients from the most deprived quintile: surgery (OR 0.78), chemotherapy in stage IV (OR 0.88), and chemotherapy in stage II-III (OR 0.79). The median SCDI was 20 days for patients from the most and least deprived areas. However, patients from the most deprived area had a significantly longer time to diagnosis after adjusting for other factors (median difference 0.73 days [95% CI 0.09-1.36]). Meanwhile, the median treatment interval was 55 and 57 days for patients from the least and most deprived areas, respectively. The treatment interval was significantly longer for patients from the most, compared with the least deprived areas after adjusting for important factors (median difference 2.29 days [95% CI 1.28-3.31]).

Conclusions

In this large cohort of patients with colon cancer in England, we demonstrated that patients from more deprived areas are less likely to receive surgery or chemotherapy and wait longer to commence treatment. Further research is needed to understand why and what evidence-based actions can reduce these inequalities in treatment and timeliness.

Clinical trial identification

NCT05185388.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

University of Hull.

Funding

Yorkshire Cancer Research.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.