Abstract 1735P
Background
Among long-term cancer survivors (i.e., survived > 5 years since most recent cancer diagnosis) with a non-lung primary cancer, second primary lung cancer (SPLC) has the highest incidence (19%) and mortality (32%) rate among all secondary primary cancers. There are currently no separate screening guidelines for SPLC, though most providers have adopted the general USPSTF recommendation for lung cancer screening (LCS) in cancer survivors. We aimed to assess the differences in LCS eligibility rates among long-term cancer survivors under the USPSTF 2013 vs revised 2021 guidelines.
Methods
Smokers aged 50-79 years were selected from the 2017-2021 US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. We assessed the eligibility of LCS using USPSTF 2013 criteria: current or former smokers (quit ≤ 15 years), 55-80 years of age and ≥ 30 pack-year smoking history, and the revised 2021 criteria (expanding age to 50-80 and pack-year to 20) in long-term cancer survivors. Weighted chi-square tests were used with SAS (9.4).
Results
A weighted total of 17,544,768 smokers were selected (2.7% were cancer survivors). The LCS eligibility rate of long-term cancer survivors using the 2013 criteria was similar to the non-cancer survivors (21.1% vs 22.4%; p=0.62) but lower when using the 2021 criteria (31.5% vs 38.0%; p=0.03). The 2021 criteria increased eligibility for long-term cancer survivors across all groups (Table). However, the degree of increase in eligibility rate in cancer survivors was lower than in non-cancer survivors.
Table: 1735P
Weighted eligibility rate % (95%CI) | Long-term cancer survivors (CS) | Δ % in CS | Δ % in non-CS | p-value* | |
2013 USPSTF | 2021 USPSTF | ||||
Overall | 21.1 (16.0-26.2) | 31.5 (26.0-37.1) | 10.4 | 15.6 | <0.01 |
Gender | |||||
Women | 20.5 (13.9-27.1) | 34.3 (27.3-41.5) | 13.8 | 15.8 | 0.43 |
Men | 21.6 (14.0-29.2) | 29.1 (20.9-37.4) | 7.5 | 15.4 | <0.001 |
Race | |||||
Non-Hispanic White | 23.2 (17.4-29.0) | 34.0 (27.8-40.1) | 10.8 | 16.1 | <0.01 |
Non-Hispanic Black | 9.9 (0.2-19.6) | 16.6 (4.3-29.9) | 6.7 | 14.2 | 0.08 |
Other races | 9.0 (0.0-19.0) | 21.5 (2.4-40.5) | 12.5 | 13.5 | 0.90 |
*P-value compares non-cancer survivors vs cancer survivors in the change of eligibility rate from 2013 to 2021 USPSTF criteria.
Conclusions
The increase in eligibility from the revised 2021 USPSTF appears to be less in long-term cancer survivors than in non-cancer survivors. Cancer survivors are facing a significant burden from SPLC due to their prior diagnostic tests and treatments (e.g., chest irradiation), genetic susceptibility, and shared risk factors. Tailored LCS eligibility criteria are urgently needed in the growing cancer survivor population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M.L. Hsu: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Regeneron, MJH Life Sciences. A. Dowlati: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: EMD Serono, Tesaro, Roche, Regeneron, Vertex, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Takeda, Ipsen, United Therapeutics, Mirati, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incuron; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Millenium, Seattle Genetics; Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Ariad. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1706P - Time to full approval of novel anticancer medicines granted accelerated approval and implications for reform of the accelerated approval pathway
Presenter: Thomas Hwang
Session: Poster session 23
1707P - Cancer drug prices in the US: Efficacy, innovation, clinical trial evidence, and epidemiology
Presenter: Christoph Michaeli
Session: Poster session 23
1708P - The registration pathways in China for globally developed novel anticancer drugs
Presenter: Da-wei Wu
Session: Poster session 23
1709P - Influence of censoring on conclusions of FDA-approved cancer drugs using the modified time to treatment failure
Presenter: Jonathan Ofer
Session: Poster session 23
1710P - Protocol waivers and consequences on treatment safety and efficacy in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP)
Presenter: Laurien Zeverijn
Session: Poster session 23
1711P - The DRUP-like clinical trials family: A distributed European trial network for equitable access to precision medicine
Presenter: Hans Gelderblom
Session: Poster session 23
1712P - Implementation of a molecular pre-screening program (MPP) in a network of public cancer centres for phase I clinical trial (Ph1-CT) candidates: The PREICO program
Presenter: Juan José Soto Castillo
Session: Poster session 23
1713P - Non-inferiority oncology clinical trials in major journals: Purposes, methods and results
Presenter: Rafael Barreto
Session: Poster session 23
1714P - Geographical disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in Korea
Presenter: Sokbom Kang
Session: Poster session 23
1715P - Analysis of the adequacy of control arms in oncology randomized clinical trials published between 2017 and 2021: A meta-research study
Presenter: Alessandro Rossi
Session: Poster session 23