Abstract 568P
Background
Testing for DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) is recommended for all colorectal cancers (CRC). Automation of this would facilitate precision medicine, particularly if it provided information on likely aetiology.
Methods
We developed AIMMer, an AI-based method for determination of MMR protein expression at single cell level from IHC-stained routine pathology samples. We applied it to over 2,000 cases from the SCOT clinical trial, which compared 3 vs 6 months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) for stage II/III CRC. AIMMer performance was evaluated against ground truth established by blinded review by two expert pathologists, and MMRd prognostic and predictive value was determined by Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
Benchmarking of AIMMeR against pathologist ground truth MMR calls revealed AUROC of 0.98 (bootstrap 95% CI = 0.97–0.99) and Youden index (sensitivity plus specificity) of 1.87 at cutpoint of 10.7% MMR positive cells. This cutpoint gave positive predictive value (PPV) of >95% for both the commonest pattern of somatic MMRd (MLH1 and PMS2 loss) and for MMR proficient (MMRp) status, and agreement with pathologist calls approaching that between individual pathologists (k = 0.79–0.82 vs 0.88). Analysis of CRC recurrence-free interval (RFI) confirmed MMRd prognostic value in oxaliplatin-treated patients (multivariable-adjusted HR (aHR) = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.44–0.88, P=0.007), with effect size larger in those <70 years and those with right-sided tumours. MMRd did not predict differential benefit from chemotherapy duration. Patients with MMRp tumors had similar RFI whether treated with CAPOX or FOLFOX (aHR = 0.95, 95% CI= 0.77-1.16, P=0.6), while those with MMRd tumours treated with FOLFOX had shorter RFI (aHR = 2.08, 95% CI= 1.09-3.97, P=0.027, P INTERACTION=0.04).
Conclusions
AIMMeR holds promise to reduce pathologist workflow and streamline clinical diagnostics in CRC. The possible predictive value of MMRd for chemotherapy regimen should be investigated in additional cohorts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
D.N. Church.
Funding
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Promedica.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
581P - The effect of exercise intervention on defecation related symptoms of colorectal cancer patients a randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Justin Jeon
Session: Poster session 10
582P - High accuracy of a blood-based multimodal ctDNA test to detect advanced neoplasms in a FIT-positive screening population
Presenter: Joana Vidal Barrull
Session: Poster session 10
583P - A rapid blood test for the earlier detection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Jennifer Nobes
Session: Poster session 10
584P - Two-year update of the prospective evaluation of ColonAiQ (PreC) study
Presenter: Yanbing Ding
Session: Poster session 10
585P - Fragmentomics early detection assay leading to potential clinical benefits in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yuepeng Cao
Session: Poster session 10
586P - Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection using a tumour naïve circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) assay in patients (pts) with resected colorectal cancer (CRC) in the phase III ASCOLT trial
Presenter: Daphne Day
Session: Poster session 10
588P - PLCRC-PROVENC3 study: Prognostic value of post-surgery liquid biopsy circulating tumor DNA in stage III colon cancer patients
Presenter: Carmen Rubio-Alarcón
Session: Poster session 10
589P - Impact of landmark point selection on molecular residual disease detection in stage I-IV resectable colorectal cancer
Presenter: Di Cao
Session: Poster session 10
590P - Assessment of circulating tumor (ct)DNA in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) pts treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT)
Presenter: Chiara Molinari
Session: Poster session 10