Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 10

568P - Single cell AI-based detection of DNA mismatch repair deficiency in 1,988 colorectal cancers reveals prognostic and predictive value in the SCOT trial

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 10

Topics

Pathology/Molecular Biology

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Faiz Jabbar

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S410-S457. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01935-X

Authors

F. Jabbar1, M. Nowak2, A. Rodewald2, L. Gneo1, T. Tomasevic1, A. Harkin3, T.J. Iveson4, M.P. Saunders5, R. kerr1, K.A. Oien3, N. maka6, J. Hay6, J. Edwards7, I. Tomlinson1, O.J. Sansom7, C. Kelly3, A. Easton1, E. Domingo8, V.H. Koelzer9, D.N. Church1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology Department, University of Oxford, OX3 7DQ - Oxford/GB
  • 2 Pathology And Molecular Pathology, USZ - University Hospital Zurich - Institute of Pathology, 8091 - Zurich/CH
  • 3 Cancer Research Uk Clinical Trials Unit, BWSCC - Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre - NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, G12 0YN - Glasgow/GB
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Southampton General Hospital, SO16 6YD - Southampton/GB
  • 5 Clinical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, M20 4BX - Manchester/GB
  • 6 Glasgow Tissue Research Facility, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, G11 6NT - Glasgow/GB
  • 7 Institute Cancers Sciences, CRUK - Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, G61 1BD - Glasgow/GB
  • 8 Department Of Oncology, University Of Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford/GB
  • 9 Pathology, USZ - University Hospital Zurich - Institute of Pathology, 8091 - Zurich/CH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 568P

Background

Testing for DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) is recommended for all colorectal cancers (CRC). Automation of this would facilitate precision medicine, particularly if it provided information on likely aetiology.

Methods

We developed AIMMer, an AI-based method for determination of MMR protein expression at single cell level from IHC-stained routine pathology samples. We applied it to over 2,000 cases from the SCOT clinical trial, which compared 3 vs 6 months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) for stage II/III CRC. AIMMer performance was evaluated against ground truth established by blinded review by two expert pathologists, and MMRd prognostic and predictive value was determined by Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Benchmarking of AIMMeR against pathologist ground truth MMR calls revealed AUROC of 0.98 (bootstrap 95% CI = 0.97–0.99) and Youden index (sensitivity plus specificity) of 1.87 at cutpoint of 10.7% MMR positive cells. This cutpoint gave positive predictive value (PPV) of >95% for both the commonest pattern of somatic MMRd (MLH1 and PMS2 loss) and for MMR proficient (MMRp) status, and agreement with pathologist calls approaching that between individual pathologists (k = 0.79–0.82 vs 0.88). Analysis of CRC recurrence-free interval (RFI) confirmed MMRd prognostic value in oxaliplatin-treated patients (multivariable-adjusted HR (aHR) = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.44–0.88, P=0.007), with effect size larger in those <70 years and those with right-sided tumours. MMRd did not predict differential benefit from chemotherapy duration. Patients with MMRp tumors had similar RFI whether treated with CAPOX or FOLFOX (aHR = 0.95, 95% CI= 0.77-1.16, P=0.6), while those with MMRd tumours treated with FOLFOX had shorter RFI (aHR = 2.08, 95% CI= 1.09-3.97, P=0.027, P INTERACTION=0.04).

Conclusions

AIMMeR holds promise to reduce pathologist workflow and streamline clinical diagnostics in CRC. The possible predictive value of MMRd for chemotherapy regimen should be investigated in additional cohorts.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

D.N. Church.

Funding

Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Promedica.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.