Abstract 568P
Background
Testing for DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) is recommended for all colorectal cancers (CRC). Automation of this would facilitate precision medicine, particularly if it provided information on likely aetiology.
Methods
We developed AIMMer, an AI-based method for determination of MMR protein expression at single cell level from IHC-stained routine pathology samples. We applied it to over 2,000 cases from the SCOT clinical trial, which compared 3 vs 6 months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) for stage II/III CRC. AIMMer performance was evaluated against ground truth established by blinded review by two expert pathologists, and MMRd prognostic and predictive value was determined by Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
Benchmarking of AIMMeR against pathologist ground truth MMR calls revealed AUROC of 0.98 (bootstrap 95% CI = 0.97–0.99) and Youden index (sensitivity plus specificity) of 1.87 at cutpoint of 10.7% MMR positive cells. This cutpoint gave positive predictive value (PPV) of >95% for both the commonest pattern of somatic MMRd (MLH1 and PMS2 loss) and for MMR proficient (MMRp) status, and agreement with pathologist calls approaching that between individual pathologists (k = 0.79–0.82 vs 0.88). Analysis of CRC recurrence-free interval (RFI) confirmed MMRd prognostic value in oxaliplatin-treated patients (multivariable-adjusted HR (aHR) = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.44–0.88, P=0.007), with effect size larger in those <70 years and those with right-sided tumours. MMRd did not predict differential benefit from chemotherapy duration. Patients with MMRp tumors had similar RFI whether treated with CAPOX or FOLFOX (aHR = 0.95, 95% CI= 0.77-1.16, P=0.6), while those with MMRd tumours treated with FOLFOX had shorter RFI (aHR = 2.08, 95% CI= 1.09-3.97, P=0.027, P INTERACTION=0.04).
Conclusions
AIMMeR holds promise to reduce pathologist workflow and streamline clinical diagnostics in CRC. The possible predictive value of MMRd for chemotherapy regimen should be investigated in additional cohorts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
D.N. Church.
Funding
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Promedica.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10