Abstract 568P
Background
Testing for DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) is recommended for all colorectal cancers (CRC). Automation of this would facilitate precision medicine, particularly if it provided information on likely aetiology.
Methods
We developed AIMMer, an AI-based method for determination of MMR protein expression at single cell level from IHC-stained routine pathology samples. We applied it to over 2,000 cases from the SCOT clinical trial, which compared 3 vs 6 months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) for stage II/III CRC. AIMMer performance was evaluated against ground truth established by blinded review by two expert pathologists, and MMRd prognostic and predictive value was determined by Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
Benchmarking of AIMMeR against pathologist ground truth MMR calls revealed AUROC of 0.98 (bootstrap 95% CI = 0.97–0.99) and Youden index (sensitivity plus specificity) of 1.87 at cutpoint of 10.7% MMR positive cells. This cutpoint gave positive predictive value (PPV) of >95% for both the commonest pattern of somatic MMRd (MLH1 and PMS2 loss) and for MMR proficient (MMRp) status, and agreement with pathologist calls approaching that between individual pathologists (k = 0.79–0.82 vs 0.88). Analysis of CRC recurrence-free interval (RFI) confirmed MMRd prognostic value in oxaliplatin-treated patients (multivariable-adjusted HR (aHR) = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.44–0.88, P=0.007), with effect size larger in those <70 years and those with right-sided tumours. MMRd did not predict differential benefit from chemotherapy duration. Patients with MMRp tumors had similar RFI whether treated with CAPOX or FOLFOX (aHR = 0.95, 95% CI= 0.77-1.16, P=0.6), while those with MMRd tumours treated with FOLFOX had shorter RFI (aHR = 2.08, 95% CI= 1.09-3.97, P=0.027, P INTERACTION=0.04).
Conclusions
AIMMeR holds promise to reduce pathologist workflow and streamline clinical diagnostics in CRC. The possible predictive value of MMRd for chemotherapy regimen should be investigated in additional cohorts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
D.N. Church.
Funding
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Promedica.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
538P - Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with brain metastases included in early phase clinical trials
Presenter: Giulia Pretelli
Session: Poster session 10
539P - Epidemiology and prognostic factors of lung cancer and brain metastases: A 10-year retrospective population cohort study in Girona, Spain
Presenter: Eduard Teixidor Vilà
Session: Poster session 10
540P - Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) on survival time in patients with hemangiopericytoma (HPC): A population study
Presenter: Tala Alshwayyat
Session: Poster session 10
541P - A multicenter study evaluating the clinical and molecular characteristics of adult patients with diffuse midline and non-midline K27M altered gliomas
Presenter: Manuel Mazariegos Rubi
Session: Poster session 10
542P - Drug screening in Li-Fraumeni syndrome brain tumor models
Presenter: Anna Kolodziejczak
Session: Poster session 10
543P - Bevacizumab and hydroxyurea treatment in grade 2 and 3 meningioma: A monocentric experience
Presenter: Giulia Cerretti
Session: Poster session 10
544P - Clinical and molecular features of primary central nervous system tumor with Lynch syndrome
Presenter: Nan Liu
Session: Poster session 10
545P - Antibody-fragment based immunotherapeutic approaches for medulloblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma
Presenter: Judith Niesen
Session: Poster session 10
546P - Early urinary potassium level is predictive of delayed methotrexate (MTX) elimination in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL)
Presenter: Alexandre Bertucci
Session: Poster session 10
547P - Clinicopathological and molecular study of embryonal tumours with multilayered rosettes
Presenter: Lianghong Teng
Session: Poster session 10