Abstract 568P
Background
Testing for DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) is recommended for all colorectal cancers (CRC). Automation of this would facilitate precision medicine, particularly if it provided information on likely aetiology.
Methods
We developed AIMMer, an AI-based method for determination of MMR protein expression at single cell level from IHC-stained routine pathology samples. We applied it to over 2,000 cases from the SCOT clinical trial, which compared 3 vs 6 months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) for stage II/III CRC. AIMMer performance was evaluated against ground truth established by blinded review by two expert pathologists, and MMRd prognostic and predictive value was determined by Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
Benchmarking of AIMMeR against pathologist ground truth MMR calls revealed AUROC of 0.98 (bootstrap 95% CI = 0.97–0.99) and Youden index (sensitivity plus specificity) of 1.87 at cutpoint of 10.7% MMR positive cells. This cutpoint gave positive predictive value (PPV) of >95% for both the commonest pattern of somatic MMRd (MLH1 and PMS2 loss) and for MMR proficient (MMRp) status, and agreement with pathologist calls approaching that between individual pathologists (k = 0.79–0.82 vs 0.88). Analysis of CRC recurrence-free interval (RFI) confirmed MMRd prognostic value in oxaliplatin-treated patients (multivariable-adjusted HR (aHR) = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.44–0.88, P=0.007), with effect size larger in those <70 years and those with right-sided tumours. MMRd did not predict differential benefit from chemotherapy duration. Patients with MMRp tumors had similar RFI whether treated with CAPOX or FOLFOX (aHR = 0.95, 95% CI= 0.77-1.16, P=0.6), while those with MMRd tumours treated with FOLFOX had shorter RFI (aHR = 2.08, 95% CI= 1.09-3.97, P=0.027, P INTERACTION=0.04).
Conclusions
AIMMeR holds promise to reduce pathologist workflow and streamline clinical diagnostics in CRC. The possible predictive value of MMRd for chemotherapy regimen should be investigated in additional cohorts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
D.N. Church.
Funding
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Promedica.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
518P - Artificial intelligence real-world applications in pediatric neuro-oncology: The AICCELERATE project
Presenter: Federica D'Antonio
Session: Poster session 10
519P - The landscape of PDGFRA mutation in Chinese patients with glioma
Presenter: Qiang Lv
Session: Poster session 10
520P - Copy number variation spectrum analysis of primary glioblastoma
Presenter: Chuandong Cheng
Session: Poster session 10
521P - Deciphering a three-miRNA signature as a prognostic biomarker in glioma patients: Correlation with DFS and OS
Presenter: Ana Belen Diaz Mendez
Session: Poster session 10
522P - Galectin 3 binding protein as potential biomarker in glioma diagnosis
Presenter: Rashmi Rana
Session: Poster session 10
523P - Analysis of DNA damage response (DDR) gene expression as a prognostic factor for glioblastoma patient mortality
Presenter: Alessia-Tara Droesse
Session: Poster session 10
524P - Cell line study of nucleosome-based biomarkers in the diagnosis and detection of relapses in glioblastoma
Presenter: Jonathan Decarpentrie
Session: Poster session 10
525P - Immuno markers in newly glioblastoma patients underwent Stupp protocol after neurosurgery
Presenter: Lorena Gurrieri
Session: Poster session 10
526P - In silico evaluation of the mutational profile of glioblastomas with high expression of PD1, CTLA4 and LAG3 identifies the ERBB-PI3K pathway as a druggable vulnerability target
Presenter: Cristina Saiz-Ladera
Session: Poster session 10
527P - Targetable gene fusions and other alterations in central nervous system tumors assessed by RNA and DNA-based next-generation sequencing
Presenter: LEIMING WANG
Session: Poster session 10