Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 23

1900P - Role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) in the era of immunotherapy (IO): An analysis of the national cancer database (2004-2020)

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 23

Topics

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

ALINA BASNET

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1013-S1031. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01924-5

Authors

M. Bou Zerdan1, R. Wong2, H. Goldberg3, A. BASNET3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Internal Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 13210 - Syracuse/US
  • 2 Department Of Public Health And Preventive Medicine, Norton College Of Medicine, Suny Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 13210 - Syracuse/US
  • 3 Heamtology Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 13210 - Syracuse/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1900P

Background

The effectiveness of CN is still uncertain despite two significant trials, SURTIME and CARMENA, which aimed to demonstrate its benefits for mccRCC. These trials, conducted with Sunitinib as the standard treatment, did not provide evidence supporting the use of CN.

Methods

We identified stage IV mccRCC only patients (pts) who received IO with or without surgery in the NCDB 2004-2020. Overall survival (OS) was calculated among three groups of IO alone (group (gr)1), IO followed by CN (gr2), CN followed by IO (gr3). Cox models compared OS by treatment group after adjusting for sociodemographic, health, and facility variables.

Results

From 1,549,101 renal cancer cases, 7,367 met our criteria. 2.8% of ccRCC had sarcomatoid histology. Pts in the gr 2 and gr 3 had 63%, 95% CI [0.304 - 0.460] and 47%, 95% CI [0.492-0.571] (P= 0.001) risk reduction in mortality compared to gr 1.Black race compared to white race, Medicare pts compared to privately insured, and pts treated at a comprehensive community cancer center compared to academic center had an increased mortality risk by 15%, 95% CI [1.025-1.290] (P= 0.017), 12%, 95% CI [1.017-1.242] (P= 0.021), 17%, 95% CI [1.092-1.260] (P= 0.001) respectively. Median income quartiles ranging > 63k, had 22% reduction in mortality over income quartiles < 40k, 95% CI [0.696-0.888] (P= 0.044). Regardless of the sequence of CN, partial nephrectomy was minimally used. Pts in gr 3 had a 40% increased mortality risk compared to pts in gr 3, 95% CI [1.126-1.735] (P= 0.002).

Conclusions

Pts receiving CN regardless of sequence with IO did better than IO alone in this national registry-based adjusted analysis for mccRCC. Over the past few decades, the understanding of the role of CN has undergone changes, and while we await additional trial outcomes, the current evidence supports the notion that select mRCC patients can benefit from CN.

Table: 1900P

IO (%) 95% CI IO⋄CN (%) 95% CI CN⋄IO (%) 95% CI
2 YRS FOLLOW UP 35.82 [34.44-37.20] 73.87 [68.48-78.49] 58.78 [56.75-60.74]
5 YRS FOLLOW UP 13.01 [11.32-14.82] 43.17 [33.94-52.05] 34 [31.32-36.39]

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.