Abstract 1900P
Background
The effectiveness of CN is still uncertain despite two significant trials, SURTIME and CARMENA, which aimed to demonstrate its benefits for mccRCC. These trials, conducted with Sunitinib as the standard treatment, did not provide evidence supporting the use of CN.
Methods
We identified stage IV mccRCC only patients (pts) who received IO with or without surgery in the NCDB 2004-2020. Overall survival (OS) was calculated among three groups of IO alone (group (gr)1), IO followed by CN (gr2), CN followed by IO (gr3). Cox models compared OS by treatment group after adjusting for sociodemographic, health, and facility variables.
Results
From 1,549,101 renal cancer cases, 7,367 met our criteria. 2.8% of ccRCC had sarcomatoid histology. Pts in the gr 2 and gr 3 had 63%, 95% CI [0.304 - 0.460] and 47%, 95% CI [0.492-0.571] (P= 0.001) risk reduction in mortality compared to gr 1.Black race compared to white race, Medicare pts compared to privately insured, and pts treated at a comprehensive community cancer center compared to academic center had an increased mortality risk by 15%, 95% CI [1.025-1.290] (P= 0.017), 12%, 95% CI [1.017-1.242] (P= 0.021), 17%, 95% CI [1.092-1.260] (P= 0.001) respectively. Median income quartiles ranging > 63k, had 22% reduction in mortality over income quartiles < 40k, 95% CI [0.696-0.888] (P= 0.044). Regardless of the sequence of CN, partial nephrectomy was minimally used. Pts in gr 3 had a 40% increased mortality risk compared to pts in gr 3, 95% CI [1.126-1.735] (P= 0.002).
Conclusions
Pts receiving CN regardless of sequence with IO did better than IO alone in this national registry-based adjusted analysis for mccRCC. Over the past few decades, the understanding of the role of CN has undergone changes, and while we await additional trial outcomes, the current evidence supports the notion that select mRCC patients can benefit from CN.
Table: 1900P
IO (%) 95% CI | IO⋄CN (%) 95% CI | CN⋄IO (%) 95% CI | |
2 YRS FOLLOW UP | 35.82 [34.44-37.20] | 73.87 [68.48-78.49] | 58.78 [56.75-60.74] |
5 YRS FOLLOW UP | 13.01 [11.32-14.82] | 43.17 [33.94-52.05] | 34 [31.32-36.39] |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2375P - Neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients followed by selective bladder sparing surgery
Presenter: Zhou Tong
Session: Poster session 23
2376P - Pembrolizumab monotherapy following tri-modality treatment for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Shang Bin Qin
Session: Poster session 23
2378P - Efficacy and safety outcomes with pembrolizumab (pembro) rechallenge for patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) who responded to first-course treatment
Presenter: Vadim Koshkin
Session: Poster session 23
2379P - AVENANCE: Subgroup analysis of patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) with histological variants from a real-world (RW) study of avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM)
Presenter: Philippe Barthélémy
Session: Poster session 23