Abstract 1900P
Background
The effectiveness of CN is still uncertain despite two significant trials, SURTIME and CARMENA, which aimed to demonstrate its benefits for mccRCC. These trials, conducted with Sunitinib as the standard treatment, did not provide evidence supporting the use of CN.
Methods
We identified stage IV mccRCC only patients (pts) who received IO with or without surgery in the NCDB 2004-2020. Overall survival (OS) was calculated among three groups of IO alone (group (gr)1), IO followed by CN (gr2), CN followed by IO (gr3). Cox models compared OS by treatment group after adjusting for sociodemographic, health, and facility variables.
Results
From 1,549,101 renal cancer cases, 7,367 met our criteria. 2.8% of ccRCC had sarcomatoid histology. Pts in the gr 2 and gr 3 had 63%, 95% CI [0.304 - 0.460] and 47%, 95% CI [0.492-0.571] (P= 0.001) risk reduction in mortality compared to gr 1.Black race compared to white race, Medicare pts compared to privately insured, and pts treated at a comprehensive community cancer center compared to academic center had an increased mortality risk by 15%, 95% CI [1.025-1.290] (P= 0.017), 12%, 95% CI [1.017-1.242] (P= 0.021), 17%, 95% CI [1.092-1.260] (P= 0.001) respectively. Median income quartiles ranging > 63k, had 22% reduction in mortality over income quartiles < 40k, 95% CI [0.696-0.888] (P= 0.044). Regardless of the sequence of CN, partial nephrectomy was minimally used. Pts in gr 3 had a 40% increased mortality risk compared to pts in gr 3, 95% CI [1.126-1.735] (P= 0.002).
Conclusions
Pts receiving CN regardless of sequence with IO did better than IO alone in this national registry-based adjusted analysis for mccRCC. Over the past few decades, the understanding of the role of CN has undergone changes, and while we await additional trial outcomes, the current evidence supports the notion that select mRCC patients can benefit from CN.
Table: 1900P
IO (%) 95% CI | IO⋄CN (%) 95% CI | CN⋄IO (%) 95% CI | |
2 YRS FOLLOW UP | 35.82 [34.44-37.20] | 73.87 [68.48-78.49] | 58.78 [56.75-60.74] |
5 YRS FOLLOW UP | 13.01 [11.32-14.82] | 43.17 [33.94-52.05] | 34 [31.32-36.39] |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1756P - Vizcan: A Swedish population-based study to address cancer outcomes using an interactive platform
Presenter: Anders Berglund
Session: Poster session 23
1757P - A real-world evaluation of the effectiveness of thermogram along with clinical breast examination in community-based breast cancer screening program
Presenter: Rahul Ravind
Session: Poster session 23
1758P - Body composition meets precision medicine: The prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients (pt) treated with Molecularly Targeted Agents (MTA)
Presenter: Cinta Hierro
Session: Poster session 23
1760P - Systematic review of quality of life (QoL) inclusion among endpoints, reporting and impact of QoL results in phase III non-inferiority trials of systemic treatments in oncology
Presenter: Jessica Paparo
Session: Poster session 23
1761P - Incidence of herpes zoster in cancer patients in Europe: A systematic review
Presenter: Inga Posiuniene
Session: Poster session 23
1762P - Are published data up-to-date? Analysis of time to publication in major oncological journals
Presenter: Pawel Sobczuk
Session: Poster session 23
1763P - The challenge for Cancer Trials Ireland (CTI) to sponsor NCI and non-EU sponsored trials in the EU
Presenter: Eibhlin Mulroe
Session: Poster session 23
1886P - Pembrolizumab and denosumab in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): A phase II trial (KeyPAD, ANZUP1601)
Presenter: Craig Gedye
Session: Poster session 23
1887P - Adjuvant everolimus (EVE) in patients (pts) with completely resected very high-risk renal cell cancer (RCC) and clear cell histology: Results from the phase III SWOG S0931 (EVEREST) trial
Presenter: Primo Lara
Session: Poster session 23