Abstract 704P
Background
DILD is a significant adverse event with a high fatality rate, and risk factors related to DILD have not been determined. Previous reports indicated regional differences in DILD. However, no large-scale data-based analyses investigating regional differences in DILD have been reported.
Methods
Adverse events report from the FAERS between January 2010 and December 2020 were collected. Regional differences in DILD incidence were examined based on data from the United States (US), Europe (EU), and Japan (JP). Multivariable logistic regression analysis, including the type of agent (tyrosine kinase inhibitors: TKIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors: ICIs, antibody-drug conjugate: ADCs, and cytotoxic agents) as confounding factors, was performed to calculate the reporting odds ratios (RORs).
Results
We identified reports of DILD from the US, EU and JP (74548, 31009, and 23004). Results of univariate analysis showed significantly higher RORs of anticancer drugs for reports from JP and EU compared to those from the US (JP, ROR 4.432 [95% CI, 4.366-4.499], p<0.001; EU, ROR 1.291 [95%CI, 1.274-1.308], p<0.001). Results of multivariable analysis for each single agent regimen of anticancer drugs showed that, for all regimens, reports from JP had significantly higher RORs compared to those from the US (TKIs, ROR 3.274 [95%CI, 3.105-3.451], p<0.001; ICIs, ROR 2.170 [95%CI, 2.025-2.325], p<0.001; ADCs, ROR 2.335 [95%CI, 1.666-3.272], p<0.001; cytotoxic agents, ROR 3.989 [95%CI, 3.776-4.215], p<0.001). Reports from the EU showed higher RORs for TKIs and cytotoxic agents than the US, but no significant difference between ICIs and ADCs (TKIs, ROR 1.679 [95%CI, 1.594-1.769], p=0.0034; ICIs, ROR 1.041 [95%CI, 0.965-1.123], p=0.2960; ADCs, ROR 1.046 [95%CI, 0.763-1.434], p=0.7804; cytotoxic agents, ROR 1.418 [95%CI, 1.354-1.485], p<0.001).
Conclusions
Reports from JP had significantly higher RORs than those from the US for all anticancer drug regimens. Further, reports from the EU had higher RORs than the US for TKIs and cytotoxic agents, but no significant difference among ICIs and ADCs. Japanese patients may have a higher risk for DILD than US and EU patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
97P - Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (D+GemCis) versus gemcis alone for localized biliary tract cancer (BTC): Results of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial (DEBATE)
Presenter: Changhoon Yoo
Session: Poster session 17
101P - Quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients (pts) with zanidatamab (zani)-treated HER2-positive (HER2+) biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the phase IIb HERIZON-BTC-01 study
Presenter: Harpreet Wasan
Session: Poster session 17
102P - Potentially prognostic factors of overall survival in advanced biliary tract cancer in the randomised phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster session 17
103P - Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised trials to compare efficacy of second-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: Jaewon Hyung
Session: Poster session 17
104P - Final analysis of the prospective, randomized phase II STAMP trial: Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) versus capecitabine (CAP) in node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)
Presenter: Hyehyun Jeong
Session: Poster session 17
105P - A phase II study of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after failure of first-line therapy
Presenter: Jia Fan
Session: Poster session 17