Abstract 704P
Background
DILD is a significant adverse event with a high fatality rate, and risk factors related to DILD have not been determined. Previous reports indicated regional differences in DILD. However, no large-scale data-based analyses investigating regional differences in DILD have been reported.
Methods
Adverse events report from the FAERS between January 2010 and December 2020 were collected. Regional differences in DILD incidence were examined based on data from the United States (US), Europe (EU), and Japan (JP). Multivariable logistic regression analysis, including the type of agent (tyrosine kinase inhibitors: TKIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors: ICIs, antibody-drug conjugate: ADCs, and cytotoxic agents) as confounding factors, was performed to calculate the reporting odds ratios (RORs).
Results
We identified reports of DILD from the US, EU and JP (74548, 31009, and 23004). Results of univariate analysis showed significantly higher RORs of anticancer drugs for reports from JP and EU compared to those from the US (JP, ROR 4.432 [95% CI, 4.366-4.499], p<0.001; EU, ROR 1.291 [95%CI, 1.274-1.308], p<0.001). Results of multivariable analysis for each single agent regimen of anticancer drugs showed that, for all regimens, reports from JP had significantly higher RORs compared to those from the US (TKIs, ROR 3.274 [95%CI, 3.105-3.451], p<0.001; ICIs, ROR 2.170 [95%CI, 2.025-2.325], p<0.001; ADCs, ROR 2.335 [95%CI, 1.666-3.272], p<0.001; cytotoxic agents, ROR 3.989 [95%CI, 3.776-4.215], p<0.001). Reports from the EU showed higher RORs for TKIs and cytotoxic agents than the US, but no significant difference between ICIs and ADCs (TKIs, ROR 1.679 [95%CI, 1.594-1.769], p=0.0034; ICIs, ROR 1.041 [95%CI, 0.965-1.123], p=0.2960; ADCs, ROR 1.046 [95%CI, 0.763-1.434], p=0.7804; cytotoxic agents, ROR 1.418 [95%CI, 1.354-1.485], p<0.001).
Conclusions
Reports from JP had significantly higher RORs than those from the US for all anticancer drug regimens. Further, reports from the EU had higher RORs than the US for TKIs and cytotoxic agents, but no significant difference among ICIs and ADCs. Japanese patients may have a higher risk for DILD than US and EU patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
126P - Biliary tract cancer (BTC) characterization on a cohort of patients (pt) from the Spanish RETUD Registry
Presenter: Adelaida Lacasta
Session: Poster session 17
127P - Prognostic significance of intratumoral and peritumoral budding in distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma
Presenter: Sun-Young Jun
Session: Poster session 17
128P - Biliary tract cancers: Epidemiological and prognosis trends of Latin American population
Presenter: Maria del Consuelo Diaz Romero
Session: Poster session 17
129P - Prognostic factors associated with survival in resected biliary tract cancers: A multicentre Italian experience
Presenter: Michele Ghidini
Session: Poster session 17
663P - Safety and preliminary efficacy of the KRAS G12C Inhibitor MK-1084 in solid tumors and in combination with pembrolizumab in NSCLC
Presenter: Carlos Rojas
Session: Poster session 17
664P - Final results of a phase I/II study of combined BCL-xL and MEK inhibition with navitoclax and trametinib in KRAS or NRAS mutant advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Ryan Corcoran
Session: Poster session 17
666P - Updated efficacy and safety data of entrectinib in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK fusion-positive (fp) solid tumours
Presenter: Shun Lu
Session: Poster session 17
667P - Efficacy and safety of larotrectinib (laro) as first-line treatment for patients (pts) with tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion cancer
Presenter: David Hong
Session: Poster session 17