Abstract 104P
Background
The primary analysis of the STAMP trial demonstrated that adjuvant GemCis did not improve disease-free survival (DFS) compared to CAP in patients (pts) with resected, lymph node (LN)-positive extrahepatic CCA. As overall survival (OS) data were not matured at primary analysis, we report the updated analysis with an additional 19 months (mo) of follow-up.
Methods
Pts with adenocarcinoma of perihilar/distal bile duct with regional LN metastasis who underwent curative-intent surgery was randomized to receive GemCis (Gem 1000 mg/m2, Cis 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8) or CAP (1250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14) every 3 weeks for 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was DFS. Secondary endpoints were OS and safety. All P values were one-sided and considered significant if < 0.1.
Results
A total of 101 pts (50 in the GemCis and 51 in the CAP group) were included in the intention-to-treat population. The median follow-up duration was 52.8 mo (one-sided 90% CI, 50.1-58.2). In the GemCis and CAP groups, the median DFS was 14.6 mo (10.7-16.5) and 11.1 mo (8.4-12.7), respectively, and the 4-year DFS rates were 15.9% (9.4-24.0) and 19.4% (12.4-27.5) respectively (HR = 1.02 [0.76-1.37], P = 0.47). Median OS was 35.0 mo (29.5-42.7) and 32.3 mo (28.3-45.6), respectively, and the 4-year OS rates were 35.7% (26.5-45.1) and 38.4% (29.2-47.5), respectively (HR = 1.04 [0.75-1.44], P = 0.43). Subgroup analyses showed consistent results without significant interactions in the DFS and OS between groups, except that pts with R1 resection favored CAP in DFS and OS, and females favored GemCis in OS. Table: 104P
GemCis | CAP | HR (CI) and P-value | |
DFS events/pts | 40/50 | 41/51 | |
Median DFS (months) (CI) | 14.6 (10.7-16.5) | 11.1 (8.4-12.7) | 1.02 (0.76-1.37) P = 0.47 |
4Y DFS rates (%) (CI) | 15.9 (9.4-24.0) | 19.4 (12.4-27.5) | |
Deaths/pts | 33/50 | 33/51 | |
Median OS (months) (CI) | 35.0 (29.5-42.7) | 32.3 (28.3-45.6) | 1.04 (0.75-1.44) P = 0.43 |
4Y OS rates (%) (CI) | 35.7 (26.5-45.1) | 38.4 (29.2-47.5) |
Conclusions
In this final analysis of the STAMP trial, adjuvant GemCis did not improve OS compared with CAP in LN-positive extrahepatic CCA. Biomarker analyses, including ctDNA-guided minimal residual disease (MRD), are currently underway.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03079427.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Chong Kun Dang Pharm, Ildong pharmaceuticals.
Disclosure
J.H. Jeong: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: Boryung Pharmaceutical, Daewoong Phar- maceutical, Eisai, inno.N, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. H. Chon: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Roche, BMS, Boryoung. C. Yoo: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer, Celgene, Eisai, Ipsen, Servier, Roche, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
97P - Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (D+GemCis) versus gemcis alone for localized biliary tract cancer (BTC): Results of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial (DEBATE)
Presenter: Changhoon Yoo
Session: Poster session 17
101P - Quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients (pts) with zanidatamab (zani)-treated HER2-positive (HER2+) biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the phase IIb HERIZON-BTC-01 study
Presenter: Harpreet Wasan
Session: Poster session 17
102P - Potentially prognostic factors of overall survival in advanced biliary tract cancer in the randomised phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster session 17
103P - Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised trials to compare efficacy of second-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: Jaewon Hyung
Session: Poster session 17
105P - A phase II study of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after failure of first-line therapy
Presenter: Jia Fan
Session: Poster session 17