Abstract 704P
Background
DILD is a significant adverse event with a high fatality rate, and risk factors related to DILD have not been determined. Previous reports indicated regional differences in DILD. However, no large-scale data-based analyses investigating regional differences in DILD have been reported.
Methods
Adverse events report from the FAERS between January 2010 and December 2020 were collected. Regional differences in DILD incidence were examined based on data from the United States (US), Europe (EU), and Japan (JP). Multivariable logistic regression analysis, including the type of agent (tyrosine kinase inhibitors: TKIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors: ICIs, antibody-drug conjugate: ADCs, and cytotoxic agents) as confounding factors, was performed to calculate the reporting odds ratios (RORs).
Results
We identified reports of DILD from the US, EU and JP (74548, 31009, and 23004). Results of univariate analysis showed significantly higher RORs of anticancer drugs for reports from JP and EU compared to those from the US (JP, ROR 4.432 [95% CI, 4.366-4.499], p<0.001; EU, ROR 1.291 [95%CI, 1.274-1.308], p<0.001). Results of multivariable analysis for each single agent regimen of anticancer drugs showed that, for all regimens, reports from JP had significantly higher RORs compared to those from the US (TKIs, ROR 3.274 [95%CI, 3.105-3.451], p<0.001; ICIs, ROR 2.170 [95%CI, 2.025-2.325], p<0.001; ADCs, ROR 2.335 [95%CI, 1.666-3.272], p<0.001; cytotoxic agents, ROR 3.989 [95%CI, 3.776-4.215], p<0.001). Reports from the EU showed higher RORs for TKIs and cytotoxic agents than the US, but no significant difference between ICIs and ADCs (TKIs, ROR 1.679 [95%CI, 1.594-1.769], p=0.0034; ICIs, ROR 1.041 [95%CI, 0.965-1.123], p=0.2960; ADCs, ROR 1.046 [95%CI, 0.763-1.434], p=0.7804; cytotoxic agents, ROR 1.418 [95%CI, 1.354-1.485], p<0.001).
Conclusions
Reports from JP had significantly higher RORs than those from the US for all anticancer drug regimens. Further, reports from the EU had higher RORs than the US for TKIs and cytotoxic agents, but no significant difference among ICIs and ADCs. Japanese patients may have a higher risk for DILD than US and EU patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
720TiP - Phase I, open-label, first-in-human (FIH) study of JZP815 in advanced or metastatic solid tumors harboring mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) alterations
Presenter: Abdul-Rafeh Naqash
Session: Poster session 17
722TiP - CLAUDIO-01: A multicentric phase I/II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SOT102 as monotherapy and in combination with standard of care (SoC) in patients with gastric, gastroesophageal junction(GEJ), and pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Radka Obermannova
Session: Poster session 17
732P - Efficacy and safety of high-dose chemotherapy as second or subsequent salvage therapy in relapsed or refractory germ cell cancer patients: A multicentric analysis
Presenter: Christoph Seidel
Session: Poster session 17
733P - Testicular cancer: Trends in incidence and demographics from 23,214 cases in California from 2000-2020
Presenter: David Benjamin
Session: Poster session 17
734P - Primary retroperitoneal germ-cell tumours (pR-GCT): Evaluation of treatment outcomes of an international collaboration (PRIMERE study-IGG05)
Presenter: Patrizia Giannatempo
Session: Poster session 17