Abstract 1108P
Background
Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have changed the treatment paradigm for patients (pts) with advanced melanoma with significant improvements in overall survival. This study evaluated the outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with CPI and had cessation of treatment due to either complete response (CR) or toxicities (tox).
Methods
From January 2015 to December 2021, 699 pts with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were treated by a single prescriber across two centres in Brisbane, Queensland. In this retrospective study, we analysed 237 pts who had ceased CPI either due to CR, defined trial protocol or tox. We performed descriptive analyses of outcomes following cessation of CPI and subsequent treatment received after documented disease recurrence.
Results
Of the 237 pts who had ceased CPI, 176 pts had CR, 53 pts had treatment related tox and 8 pts had completed trial protocol. The average age of pts treated with CPI was 63 years old and the mean duration of treatment was 448 days. In this study, 71.3% of pts were BRAF wild-type, 27.4% of pts had a BRAF mutation and 1.3% of pts with uveal melanoma. 59.5% of pts had monotherapy CPI while 40.5% of pts had combination CPI. 182 pts (76.8%) had ongoing CR whilst 55 pts (23.2%) relapsed following cessation of therapy. In the cohort that relapsed, 36 pts had stopped CPI due to CR or defined trial protocol and 19 pts stopped following treatment related tox. The relapse rate was higher in pts stopped CPI due to tox (35.8%) compared to the cohort of pts who ceased due to CR or defined trial protocol (19.6%). Of those 55 pts who had relapsed, 22 were rechallenged with response, 12 were rechallenged with no response, 2 were rechallenged but ceased due to tox, 1 was rechallenged and is awaiting restaging, 7 had local therapy with either radiation therapy or surgery, 3 had different systemic therapy. 8 pts received best supportive cares.
Conclusions
Patients who had ceased CPI following CR had durable responses and a lower rate of relapse compared to pts with treatment related tox. On recurrence, retreatment with immunotherapy demonstrated response and could be considered a viable treatment option.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V.G. Atkinson: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, QBiotics; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Limbic; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Support: BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13
1119P - Stage IIIA melanoma with isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes: Time for reviewing the AJCC v8 classification
Presenter: Teresa Amaral
Session: Poster session 13