Abstract 1108P
Background
Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have changed the treatment paradigm for patients (pts) with advanced melanoma with significant improvements in overall survival. This study evaluated the outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with CPI and had cessation of treatment due to either complete response (CR) or toxicities (tox).
Methods
From January 2015 to December 2021, 699 pts with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were treated by a single prescriber across two centres in Brisbane, Queensland. In this retrospective study, we analysed 237 pts who had ceased CPI either due to CR, defined trial protocol or tox. We performed descriptive analyses of outcomes following cessation of CPI and subsequent treatment received after documented disease recurrence.
Results
Of the 237 pts who had ceased CPI, 176 pts had CR, 53 pts had treatment related tox and 8 pts had completed trial protocol. The average age of pts treated with CPI was 63 years old and the mean duration of treatment was 448 days. In this study, 71.3% of pts were BRAF wild-type, 27.4% of pts had a BRAF mutation and 1.3% of pts with uveal melanoma. 59.5% of pts had monotherapy CPI while 40.5% of pts had combination CPI. 182 pts (76.8%) had ongoing CR whilst 55 pts (23.2%) relapsed following cessation of therapy. In the cohort that relapsed, 36 pts had stopped CPI due to CR or defined trial protocol and 19 pts stopped following treatment related tox. The relapse rate was higher in pts stopped CPI due to tox (35.8%) compared to the cohort of pts who ceased due to CR or defined trial protocol (19.6%). Of those 55 pts who had relapsed, 22 were rechallenged with response, 12 were rechallenged with no response, 2 were rechallenged but ceased due to tox, 1 was rechallenged and is awaiting restaging, 7 had local therapy with either radiation therapy or surgery, 3 had different systemic therapy. 8 pts received best supportive cares.
Conclusions
Patients who had ceased CPI following CR had durable responses and a lower rate of relapse compared to pts with treatment related tox. On recurrence, retreatment with immunotherapy demonstrated response and could be considered a viable treatment option.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V.G. Atkinson: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, QBiotics; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Limbic; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Support: BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1130P - Tebentafusp (tebe) in an ongoing cohort of 72 French patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM)
Presenter: Leah Mailly-Giacchetti
Session: Poster session 13
1131P - Management of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) patients on tebentafusp in a real-world setting
Presenter: Mauricio Fernando Ribeiro
Session: Poster session 13
1132P - Chemokine expression in uveal melanoma and association with tumor genetics and response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Aparna Nallagangula
Session: Poster session 13
1133P - SF3B1 mutation predicts improved overall survival in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: Molecular and clinical correlates
Presenter: Luis del Carpio Huerta
Session: Poster session 13
1134P - Safety and efficacy of low dose (LD) ipilimumab (Ipi) + pembrolizumab (pem) in checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) naïve patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM)
Presenter: Isabella Glitza
Session: Poster session 13
1135P - Comparison of intracranial (IC) response assessment criteria in patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with combination nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) in CheckMate 204
Presenter: Raymond Huang
Session: Poster session 13
1136P - Regorafenib combined with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors for the treatment of refractory melanoma brain metastases
Presenter: Iris Dirven
Session: Poster session 13
1138P - Intralesional administration of L19IL2/L19TNF in difficult-to-treat non-melanoma skin cancer shows a favorable safety profile and preliminary clinical activity
Presenter: Lukas Flatz
Session: Poster session 13
1139P - Final results of a phase II study of pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCCs)
Presenter: Eve Maubec
Session: Poster session 13