Abstract 1108P
Background
Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have changed the treatment paradigm for patients (pts) with advanced melanoma with significant improvements in overall survival. This study evaluated the outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with CPI and had cessation of treatment due to either complete response (CR) or toxicities (tox).
Methods
From January 2015 to December 2021, 699 pts with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were treated by a single prescriber across two centres in Brisbane, Queensland. In this retrospective study, we analysed 237 pts who had ceased CPI either due to CR, defined trial protocol or tox. We performed descriptive analyses of outcomes following cessation of CPI and subsequent treatment received after documented disease recurrence.
Results
Of the 237 pts who had ceased CPI, 176 pts had CR, 53 pts had treatment related tox and 8 pts had completed trial protocol. The average age of pts treated with CPI was 63 years old and the mean duration of treatment was 448 days. In this study, 71.3% of pts were BRAF wild-type, 27.4% of pts had a BRAF mutation and 1.3% of pts with uveal melanoma. 59.5% of pts had monotherapy CPI while 40.5% of pts had combination CPI. 182 pts (76.8%) had ongoing CR whilst 55 pts (23.2%) relapsed following cessation of therapy. In the cohort that relapsed, 36 pts had stopped CPI due to CR or defined trial protocol and 19 pts stopped following treatment related tox. The relapse rate was higher in pts stopped CPI due to tox (35.8%) compared to the cohort of pts who ceased due to CR or defined trial protocol (19.6%). Of those 55 pts who had relapsed, 22 were rechallenged with response, 12 were rechallenged with no response, 2 were rechallenged but ceased due to tox, 1 was rechallenged and is awaiting restaging, 7 had local therapy with either radiation therapy or surgery, 3 had different systemic therapy. 8 pts received best supportive cares.
Conclusions
Patients who had ceased CPI following CR had durable responses and a lower rate of relapse compared to pts with treatment related tox. On recurrence, retreatment with immunotherapy demonstrated response and could be considered a viable treatment option.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V.G. Atkinson: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, QBiotics; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Limbic; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Support: BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1198P - Phase Ib portion of the ACTION-1 phase Ib/3 trial of RYZ101 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) progressing after 177Lu somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy: Safety and efficacy findings
Presenter: Jonathan Strosberg
Session: Poster session 13
1199P - MAVERIC: Phase II randomized study of everolimus as maintenance therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (mNEN) with pulmonary or gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) origin. Results on behalf of the GOIRC
Presenter: Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Session: Poster session 13
1200P - A phase II single-arm interventional trial evaluating the activity and safety of CABOzantinib (CBZ) plus TEMozolomide (TMZ) in lung and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) progressed after SSA therapy, everolimus, sunitinib or PRRT: CABOTEM Trial
Presenter: oOttavia Clemente
Session: Poster session 13
1201P - Evaluation of efficacy TEMCAP regiment as first-line or further line therapy in patients with advanced, unresectable, progressive GEP-NET. Real-world data
Presenter: Agnieszka Kolasinska-Cwikla
Session: Poster session 13
1202P - Final analysis of TENEC trial: A phase II trial of temozolomide (TMZ) as second-line treatment for advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in patients (pts) with a poor performance status (PS)
Presenter: Claudia von Arx
Session: Poster session 13