Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 01

199P - Novel machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict immunotherapy response in small cell (SCLC) and non-small cell (NSCLC) lung cancer

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 01

Topics

Genetic and Genomic Testing;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Small Cell Lung Cancer;  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Lakshya Sharma

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S233-S277. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01932-4

Authors

L. Sharma1, S. Choi1, V. Balaji2, A. Joshi3, I. Mporas4, J. Shi5, Y. Zhao3, V. Tailor6, G. Powell2, D. Alrifai7, R. Shah8, J.S.C. Waters9, O.M. Adeleke2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gkt School Of Medical Education, King's College London, SE1 1UL - London/GB
  • 2 Curenetics, Curenetics Ltd, London/GB
  • 3 School Of Medicine, Imperial College London - Hammersmith Campus, W12 0NN - London/GB
  • 4 School Of Physics, Engineering & Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB - Hatfield/GB
  • 5 Department Of Oncology, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, SW17 0QT - London/GB
  • 6 Curenx, CurenX, Precision Health, DE 19901 - Delaware/US
  • 7 Cancer Department, Guys and St Thomas NHS Trust, SE11 4TX - London/GB
  • 8 Medical Oncology, Maidstone Hospital, ME16 9QQ - Maidstone/GB
  • 9 Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone Hospital - Maidstone and Tunbridge NHS Trust, ME16 9QQ - Maidstone/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 199P

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used to manage patients with SCLC and NSCLC lung cancer. Yet, response rates are often low and identifying patients that will benefit from ICIs can be challenging. Accurate and accessible tools that predict ICI responses could enable a precision medicine approach that improves patient outcomes. This study aimed to use ML to predict response to ICI therapies in patients with lung cancer based on clinically available data.

Methods

334 eligible records were reprocessed using one hot encoding. 161 patients had complete datasets available. Differences in data distribution were handled using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique. Six ML algorithms were trained, including Linear regression, Support Vector Classifier, XGBoost Classifier, Random Forest, Decision Tree and Gaussian Naïve Bayes Classifier. The algorithms used 80% of the training data, were tested on 20% of validation data and used the Grid Search Cross-Validation technique for hyperparameter optimization.

Results

Of the 161 patients, 9% had SCLC and 80% had NSCLC. Patients receiving Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab and Atezolizumab comprised 62%, 11% and 25% respectively. XGBoost Classifier predicted response with the most accuracy, 64%. The artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm predicted and stratified ICI response better than PD-L1 levels alone (Table). The model showed good performance status, female gender and adenocarcinoma sub-type predicted response to ICI. Conversely, M1, N2 staging, male gender, squamous cell carcinoma sub-type and receiving Atezolizumab were predictive of disease progression. Table: 199P

Response (R) % Stable Disease (SD) % Disease Progression (DP) % AI-predicted validation cohort %
R SD DP
Total N=161 29 8 63 33 6 61
PD-L1 levels <1% N=23 13 9 78 33.3 0 66.6
1-50% N=19 42 0 58 66.6 0 33.3
>50% N=33 33 11 56 50 14 36

Conclusions

Multiple novel ML models, developed using clinically available data, showed that ICI type, histopathology sub-type and TMN staging impact ICI response in lung cancer. Future studies will seek to include more SCLC cases and compare the prediction accuracy among the three ICIs.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Jane Webb for data access from electronic medical records Denny Wong for data cleaning and pre-processing.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

V. Balaji: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Curenetics. V. Tailor: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: CurenX. G. Powell: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Curenetics. R. Shah: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca , Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, Bayer, BeiGene, Guardant Health, Sanofi, EQRx. O.M. Adeleke: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Curenetics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.