Abstract 2375P
Background
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of GP regimen in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor sintilimab as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC patients and the feasibility of the following selective bladder sparing surgery.
Methods
Patients with histopathologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma without distant metastases (T2-4a, N≤1, M0, AJCC 8th), and have adequate organ function will be enrolled. The therapeutic regimen were sintilimab 200 mg once on day 8, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for four cycles. Multi-disciplinary Treatment was conducted for surgical plan following neoadjuvant therapy. Radical cystectomy (RC) and bladder sparing strategy including partial cystectomy (PC) and TURBT and surveillance were fully discussed. Salvage surgery would be evaluated after recurrence. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, pT0N0) rate. The secondary end points were pT<2 rate, R0 resection rate, event free survival (EFS) and safety.
Results
From May 4, 2020 to Aug 10, 2022, 37 patients were enrolled. Notwithstanding the poor pathological situation of high T3-T4a proportion (n=14, 37.8%), a promising bladder preservation rate was achieved (73.0%, including 19 patients TURBT, 5 patients PC and 3 surveillance). Among the patients who underwent surgery (n=34), fourteen patients (41.2%) achieved pCR, twenty-seven patients (79%) achieved pT<2 (41% pT0, 9% pTa, 26% pT1, 3% pTis). All patients achieved R0 resection. With a median follow-up of 20.1 months, seven patients relapsed (bladder preservation vs. RC, 22.2% vs. 10%, p=0.321) and 1-year EFS was 89.1%. There was no significant difference between bladder-preserving and radical surgery subgroup to EFS (P=0.569). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (n=8; 21.6%), which was related to chemotherapy. There were no Grade 3 immune-related AEs.
Conclusions
Neoadjuvant GP plus sintilimab is a promising regimen for MIBC patients, with relatively high pCR rate and triggering the emerging roles for the MDT decision-making for bladder sparing surgery.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2000032757.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1726P - Optimizing oncology drug spending in a cancer centre in Ireland
Presenter: Ruth Kieran
Session: Poster session 23
1727P - Barriers and facilitators of physician involvement in clinical oncology database management in Ukraine
Presenter: Inesa Huivaniuk
Session: Poster session 23
1728P - Implementation of a comprehensive oncology unit: Needs detected in cancer survivors during follow-up
Presenter: Francisco J Jimenez-ruiz
Session: Poster session 23
1729P - Targeted interventions in registration and reporting of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) in oncology help to improve tumor board decisions
Presenter: Lars Galonska
Session: Poster session 23
1730P - Dealing with digital paralysis: Surviving a cyberattack in a cancer centre
Presenter: Rachel J. Keogh
Session: Poster session 23
1731P - Providing access to anticancer drugs within an armed conflict: The experience of Mission Kharkiv (MK) and Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) in Ukraine
Presenter: Stanislav Polozov
Session: Poster session 23
1732P - War and the fragility of anticancer drug supply networks in Ukraine
Presenter: Olha Kostenchak-Svystak
Session: Poster session 23
1733P - Two wars at time: Fight against cancer during war time - experience of Ukraine
Presenter: Veronika Patsko
Session: Poster session 23
1734P - Early impact of a personalized lung cancer interception program for heavy smokers
Presenter: Pamela Abdayem
Session: Poster session 23
1735P - Impact of revised US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2021 lung cancer screening guideline on long-term cancer survivors in the United States
Presenter: Qian Wang
Session: Poster session 23