Abstract 2375P
Background
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of GP regimen in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor sintilimab as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC patients and the feasibility of the following selective bladder sparing surgery.
Methods
Patients with histopathologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma without distant metastases (T2-4a, N≤1, M0, AJCC 8th), and have adequate organ function will be enrolled. The therapeutic regimen were sintilimab 200 mg once on day 8, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for four cycles. Multi-disciplinary Treatment was conducted for surgical plan following neoadjuvant therapy. Radical cystectomy (RC) and bladder sparing strategy including partial cystectomy (PC) and TURBT and surveillance were fully discussed. Salvage surgery would be evaluated after recurrence. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, pT0N0) rate. The secondary end points were pT<2 rate, R0 resection rate, event free survival (EFS) and safety.
Results
From May 4, 2020 to Aug 10, 2022, 37 patients were enrolled. Notwithstanding the poor pathological situation of high T3-T4a proportion (n=14, 37.8%), a promising bladder preservation rate was achieved (73.0%, including 19 patients TURBT, 5 patients PC and 3 surveillance). Among the patients who underwent surgery (n=34), fourteen patients (41.2%) achieved pCR, twenty-seven patients (79%) achieved pT<2 (41% pT0, 9% pTa, 26% pT1, 3% pTis). All patients achieved R0 resection. With a median follow-up of 20.1 months, seven patients relapsed (bladder preservation vs. RC, 22.2% vs. 10%, p=0.321) and 1-year EFS was 89.1%. There was no significant difference between bladder-preserving and radical surgery subgroup to EFS (P=0.569). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (n=8; 21.6%), which was related to chemotherapy. There were no Grade 3 immune-related AEs.
Conclusions
Neoadjuvant GP plus sintilimab is a promising regimen for MIBC patients, with relatively high pCR rate and triggering the emerging roles for the MDT decision-making for bladder sparing surgery.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2000032757.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1716P - Addressing clinical trial disparities in Spain: A digital solution
Presenter: Max Hardy-Werbin
Session: Poster session 23
1717P - Management of patients during a digital healthcare record system transition: A phase I unit experience
Presenter: Lyra Del Rosario
Session: Poster session 23
1718P - Impact of the economic status of the patient's country of residence on the outcome of oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Saki Nishiyama
Session: Poster session 23
1719P - Decentralized clinical trials: Is there a space in Italy?
Presenter: Celeste Cagnazzo
Session: Poster session 23
1720P - Experience in the provision of oncology services immediately after a major disaster
Presenter: Burak Aktas
Session: Poster session 23
1721P - Self-assessment tool and best-practice sharing to support hospitals in improving the quality of multi-disciplinary teams in lung cancer care
Presenter: Ernest Nadal
Session: Poster session 23
1722P - Factors contributing to differences in evidence compliance rate in cancer treatment among second opinion cases
Presenter: Tomomi Sanomachi
Session: Poster session 23
1723P - Improving access to molecular tumour boards for complex genomic profiles: A healthcare policy from the Netherlands
Presenter: Sahar van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani
Session: Poster session 23
1724P - Improving access to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment through navigation: Evaluation of a one-year pilot project in Botswana
Presenter: Ariane Migeotte
Session: Poster session 23
1725P - Genetic counselling for cancer in EU member states: Review and foundation for consensus recommendations
Presenter: J. Matt McCrary
Session: Poster session 23