Abstract 2375P
Background
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of GP regimen in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor sintilimab as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC patients and the feasibility of the following selective bladder sparing surgery.
Methods
Patients with histopathologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma without distant metastases (T2-4a, N≤1, M0, AJCC 8th), and have adequate organ function will be enrolled. The therapeutic regimen were sintilimab 200 mg once on day 8, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for four cycles. Multi-disciplinary Treatment was conducted for surgical plan following neoadjuvant therapy. Radical cystectomy (RC) and bladder sparing strategy including partial cystectomy (PC) and TURBT and surveillance were fully discussed. Salvage surgery would be evaluated after recurrence. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, pT0N0) rate. The secondary end points were pT<2 rate, R0 resection rate, event free survival (EFS) and safety.
Results
From May 4, 2020 to Aug 10, 2022, 37 patients were enrolled. Notwithstanding the poor pathological situation of high T3-T4a proportion (n=14, 37.8%), a promising bladder preservation rate was achieved (73.0%, including 19 patients TURBT, 5 patients PC and 3 surveillance). Among the patients who underwent surgery (n=34), fourteen patients (41.2%) achieved pCR, twenty-seven patients (79%) achieved pT<2 (41% pT0, 9% pTa, 26% pT1, 3% pTis). All patients achieved R0 resection. With a median follow-up of 20.1 months, seven patients relapsed (bladder preservation vs. RC, 22.2% vs. 10%, p=0.321) and 1-year EFS was 89.1%. There was no significant difference between bladder-preserving and radical surgery subgroup to EFS (P=0.569). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (n=8; 21.6%), which was related to chemotherapy. There were no Grade 3 immune-related AEs.
Conclusions
Neoadjuvant GP plus sintilimab is a promising regimen for MIBC patients, with relatively high pCR rate and triggering the emerging roles for the MDT decision-making for bladder sparing surgery.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2000032757.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1756P - Vizcan: A Swedish population-based study to address cancer outcomes using an interactive platform
Presenter: Anders Berglund
Session: Poster session 23
1757P - A real-world evaluation of the effectiveness of thermogram along with clinical breast examination in community-based breast cancer screening program
Presenter: Rahul Ravind
Session: Poster session 23
1758P - Body composition meets precision medicine: The prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients (pt) treated with Molecularly Targeted Agents (MTA)
Presenter: Cinta Hierro
Session: Poster session 23
1760P - Systematic review of quality of life (QoL) inclusion among endpoints, reporting and impact of QoL results in phase III non-inferiority trials of systemic treatments in oncology
Presenter: Jessica Paparo
Session: Poster session 23
1761P - Incidence of herpes zoster in cancer patients in Europe: A systematic review
Presenter: Inga Posiuniene
Session: Poster session 23
1762P - Are published data up-to-date? Analysis of time to publication in major oncological journals
Presenter: Pawel Sobczuk
Session: Poster session 23
1763P - The challenge for Cancer Trials Ireland (CTI) to sponsor NCI and non-EU sponsored trials in the EU
Presenter: Eibhlin Mulroe
Session: Poster session 23
1886P - Pembrolizumab and denosumab in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): A phase II trial (KeyPAD, ANZUP1601)
Presenter: Craig Gedye
Session: Poster session 23
1887P - Adjuvant everolimus (EVE) in patients (pts) with completely resected very high-risk renal cell cancer (RCC) and clear cell histology: Results from the phase III SWOG S0931 (EVEREST) trial
Presenter: Primo Lara
Session: Poster session 23