Abstract 2375P
Background
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of GP regimen in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor sintilimab as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC patients and the feasibility of the following selective bladder sparing surgery.
Methods
Patients with histopathologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma without distant metastases (T2-4a, N≤1, M0, AJCC 8th), and have adequate organ function will be enrolled. The therapeutic regimen were sintilimab 200 mg once on day 8, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for four cycles. Multi-disciplinary Treatment was conducted for surgical plan following neoadjuvant therapy. Radical cystectomy (RC) and bladder sparing strategy including partial cystectomy (PC) and TURBT and surveillance were fully discussed. Salvage surgery would be evaluated after recurrence. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, pT0N0) rate. The secondary end points were pT<2 rate, R0 resection rate, event free survival (EFS) and safety.
Results
From May 4, 2020 to Aug 10, 2022, 37 patients were enrolled. Notwithstanding the poor pathological situation of high T3-T4a proportion (n=14, 37.8%), a promising bladder preservation rate was achieved (73.0%, including 19 patients TURBT, 5 patients PC and 3 surveillance). Among the patients who underwent surgery (n=34), fourteen patients (41.2%) achieved pCR, twenty-seven patients (79%) achieved pT<2 (41% pT0, 9% pTa, 26% pT1, 3% pTis). All patients achieved R0 resection. With a median follow-up of 20.1 months, seven patients relapsed (bladder preservation vs. RC, 22.2% vs. 10%, p=0.321) and 1-year EFS was 89.1%. There was no significant difference between bladder-preserving and radical surgery subgroup to EFS (P=0.569). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (n=8; 21.6%), which was related to chemotherapy. There were no Grade 3 immune-related AEs.
Conclusions
Neoadjuvant GP plus sintilimab is a promising regimen for MIBC patients, with relatively high pCR rate and triggering the emerging roles for the MDT decision-making for bladder sparing surgery.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2000032757.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1736P - Young adult lung cancer demands more attention in a low-resource area: Bangladesh perspective
Presenter: Muhammad Rafiqul Islam
Session: Poster session 23
1737P - Use of the predictive risk model LungFlagTM for lung cancer screening in screening in a Spanish reference center: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Presenter: Maria Eugenia Olmedo Garcia
Session: Poster session 23
1738P - Impact of digital platforms on exposure to tobacco and new smoking devices: A survey approach
Presenter: Diego de Haro
Session: Poster session 23
1739P - Lung cancer mortality patterns of tobacco users in the United States: A 21-year analysis (1999-2020)
Presenter: Seif Bugazia
Session: Poster session 23
1740P - Geolocation of respiratory tract cancer and its relationship with chronic exposure to PM2.5 pollutants
Presenter: Moisés González-Escamilla
Session: Poster session 23
1741P - Are physicians aware of lung cancer screening benefits and the importance of implementing this? Data from two public hospitals in Buenos Aires province, Argentina
Presenter: Valentin Vidal
Session: Poster session 23
1742P - Gender differences in incidence trends of early-onset GI cancer: The European perspective
Presenter: Irit Ben-Aharon
Session: Poster session 23
1743P - Bridging the gender gap in oncology: GEORGiNA'S quest for equality in academic research
Presenter: Khalid El Bairi
Session: Poster session 23
1744P - Socioeconomic inequalities in the diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer: A population-based English cancer registry study
Presenter: Benjamin Pickwell-Smith
Session: Poster session 23
1745P - Why do adult patients with cancer abandon treatment in India? A nationwide qualitative study to understand the perspectives of healthcare workers
Presenter: Reshma Ayiraveetil
Session: Poster session 23