Abstract 1735P
Background
Among long-term cancer survivors (i.e., survived > 5 years since most recent cancer diagnosis) with a non-lung primary cancer, second primary lung cancer (SPLC) has the highest incidence (19%) and mortality (32%) rate among all secondary primary cancers. There are currently no separate screening guidelines for SPLC, though most providers have adopted the general USPSTF recommendation for lung cancer screening (LCS) in cancer survivors. We aimed to assess the differences in LCS eligibility rates among long-term cancer survivors under the USPSTF 2013 vs revised 2021 guidelines.
Methods
Smokers aged 50-79 years were selected from the 2017-2021 US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. We assessed the eligibility of LCS using USPSTF 2013 criteria: current or former smokers (quit ≤ 15 years), 55-80 years of age and ≥ 30 pack-year smoking history, and the revised 2021 criteria (expanding age to 50-80 and pack-year to 20) in long-term cancer survivors. Weighted chi-square tests were used with SAS (9.4).
Results
A weighted total of 17,544,768 smokers were selected (2.7% were cancer survivors). The LCS eligibility rate of long-term cancer survivors using the 2013 criteria was similar to the non-cancer survivors (21.1% vs 22.4%; p=0.62) but lower when using the 2021 criteria (31.5% vs 38.0%; p=0.03). The 2021 criteria increased eligibility for long-term cancer survivors across all groups (Table). However, the degree of increase in eligibility rate in cancer survivors was lower than in non-cancer survivors.
Table: 1735P
Weighted eligibility rate % (95%CI) | Long-term cancer survivors (CS) | Δ % in CS | Δ % in non-CS | p-value* | |
2013 USPSTF | 2021 USPSTF | ||||
Overall | 21.1 (16.0-26.2) | 31.5 (26.0-37.1) | 10.4 | 15.6 | <0.01 |
Gender | |||||
Women | 20.5 (13.9-27.1) | 34.3 (27.3-41.5) | 13.8 | 15.8 | 0.43 |
Men | 21.6 (14.0-29.2) | 29.1 (20.9-37.4) | 7.5 | 15.4 | <0.001 |
Race | |||||
Non-Hispanic White | 23.2 (17.4-29.0) | 34.0 (27.8-40.1) | 10.8 | 16.1 | <0.01 |
Non-Hispanic Black | 9.9 (0.2-19.6) | 16.6 (4.3-29.9) | 6.7 | 14.2 | 0.08 |
Other races | 9.0 (0.0-19.0) | 21.5 (2.4-40.5) | 12.5 | 13.5 | 0.90 |
*P-value compares non-cancer survivors vs cancer survivors in the change of eligibility rate from 2013 to 2021 USPSTF criteria.
Conclusions
The increase in eligibility from the revised 2021 USPSTF appears to be less in long-term cancer survivors than in non-cancer survivors. Cancer survivors are facing a significant burden from SPLC due to their prior diagnostic tests and treatments (e.g., chest irradiation), genetic susceptibility, and shared risk factors. Tailored LCS eligibility criteria are urgently needed in the growing cancer survivor population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M.L. Hsu: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Regeneron, MJH Life Sciences. A. Dowlati: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: EMD Serono, Tesaro, Roche, Regeneron, Vertex, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Takeda, Ipsen, United Therapeutics, Mirati, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incuron; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Millenium, Seattle Genetics; Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Ariad. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1890P - Switch-maintenance therapy with nivolumab in TKI-sensitive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Subgroup analysis for PD-L1 status of a randomized phase II study (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Christopher Darr
Session: Poster session 23
1891P - Determinants of exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Renee Saliby
Session: Poster session 23
1892P - A pooled meta-analysis of salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (N+I) after nivolumab (N) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Rana McKay
Session: Poster session 23
1895P - Time to treatment failure (TTF) and treatment beyond progression (TBP) in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts) receiving nivolumab: A survival outcome and a therapeutic strategy of clinical benefit (meet-uro 15)
Presenter: Sara Elena Rebuzzi
Session: Poster session 23
1896P - Clinical management and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with nivolumab+ipilimumab (N+I): A real-world study
Presenter: Tom Geldart
Session: Poster session 23
1897P - Geographical differences in the management of metastatic de novo renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune-combinations
Presenter: Francesco Massari
Session: Poster session 23
1899P - Comparative effectiveness of second-line (2L) treatment (Rx) with cabozantinib (cabo) in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) after first-line (1L) Rx with ipilimumab + nivolumab (ipi+nivo) vs. PD-1/L1 inhibitor (PDI) + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)
Presenter: Georges Gebrael
Session: Poster session 23
1900P - Role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) in the era of immunotherapy (IO): An analysis of the national cancer database (2004-2020)
Presenter: ALINA BASNET
Session: Poster session 23