Abstract 1735P
Background
Among long-term cancer survivors (i.e., survived > 5 years since most recent cancer diagnosis) with a non-lung primary cancer, second primary lung cancer (SPLC) has the highest incidence (19%) and mortality (32%) rate among all secondary primary cancers. There are currently no separate screening guidelines for SPLC, though most providers have adopted the general USPSTF recommendation for lung cancer screening (LCS) in cancer survivors. We aimed to assess the differences in LCS eligibility rates among long-term cancer survivors under the USPSTF 2013 vs revised 2021 guidelines.
Methods
Smokers aged 50-79 years were selected from the 2017-2021 US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. We assessed the eligibility of LCS using USPSTF 2013 criteria: current or former smokers (quit ≤ 15 years), 55-80 years of age and ≥ 30 pack-year smoking history, and the revised 2021 criteria (expanding age to 50-80 and pack-year to 20) in long-term cancer survivors. Weighted chi-square tests were used with SAS (9.4).
Results
A weighted total of 17,544,768 smokers were selected (2.7% were cancer survivors). The LCS eligibility rate of long-term cancer survivors using the 2013 criteria was similar to the non-cancer survivors (21.1% vs 22.4%; p=0.62) but lower when using the 2021 criteria (31.5% vs 38.0%; p=0.03). The 2021 criteria increased eligibility for long-term cancer survivors across all groups (Table). However, the degree of increase in eligibility rate in cancer survivors was lower than in non-cancer survivors.
Table: 1735P
Weighted eligibility rate % (95%CI) | Long-term cancer survivors (CS) | Δ % in CS | Δ % in non-CS | p-value* | |
2013 USPSTF | 2021 USPSTF | ||||
Overall | 21.1 (16.0-26.2) | 31.5 (26.0-37.1) | 10.4 | 15.6 | <0.01 |
Gender | |||||
Women | 20.5 (13.9-27.1) | 34.3 (27.3-41.5) | 13.8 | 15.8 | 0.43 |
Men | 21.6 (14.0-29.2) | 29.1 (20.9-37.4) | 7.5 | 15.4 | <0.001 |
Race | |||||
Non-Hispanic White | 23.2 (17.4-29.0) | 34.0 (27.8-40.1) | 10.8 | 16.1 | <0.01 |
Non-Hispanic Black | 9.9 (0.2-19.6) | 16.6 (4.3-29.9) | 6.7 | 14.2 | 0.08 |
Other races | 9.0 (0.0-19.0) | 21.5 (2.4-40.5) | 12.5 | 13.5 | 0.90 |
*P-value compares non-cancer survivors vs cancer survivors in the change of eligibility rate from 2013 to 2021 USPSTF criteria.
Conclusions
The increase in eligibility from the revised 2021 USPSTF appears to be less in long-term cancer survivors than in non-cancer survivors. Cancer survivors are facing a significant burden from SPLC due to their prior diagnostic tests and treatments (e.g., chest irradiation), genetic susceptibility, and shared risk factors. Tailored LCS eligibility criteria are urgently needed in the growing cancer survivor population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M.L. Hsu: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Regeneron, MJH Life Sciences. A. Dowlati: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: EMD Serono, Tesaro, Roche, Regeneron, Vertex, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Takeda, Ipsen, United Therapeutics, Mirati, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incuron; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Millenium, Seattle Genetics; Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Ariad. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1716P - Addressing clinical trial disparities in Spain: A digital solution
Presenter: Max Hardy-Werbin
Session: Poster session 23
1717P - Management of patients during a digital healthcare record system transition: A phase I unit experience
Presenter: Lyra Del Rosario
Session: Poster session 23
1718P - Impact of the economic status of the patient's country of residence on the outcome of oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Saki Nishiyama
Session: Poster session 23
1719P - Decentralized clinical trials: Is there a space in Italy?
Presenter: Celeste Cagnazzo
Session: Poster session 23
1720P - Experience in the provision of oncology services immediately after a major disaster
Presenter: Burak Aktas
Session: Poster session 23
1721P - Self-assessment tool and best-practice sharing to support hospitals in improving the quality of multi-disciplinary teams in lung cancer care
Presenter: Ernest Nadal
Session: Poster session 23
1722P - Factors contributing to differences in evidence compliance rate in cancer treatment among second opinion cases
Presenter: Tomomi Sanomachi
Session: Poster session 23
1723P - Improving access to molecular tumour boards for complex genomic profiles: A healthcare policy from the Netherlands
Presenter: Sahar van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani
Session: Poster session 23
1724P - Improving access to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment through navigation: Evaluation of a one-year pilot project in Botswana
Presenter: Ariane Migeotte
Session: Poster session 23
1725P - Genetic counselling for cancer in EU member states: Review and foundation for consensus recommendations
Presenter: J. Matt McCrary
Session: Poster session 23