Abstract 1714P
Background
Ensuring equal opportunity to participate in clinical trials is important. We analyzed the effectiveness of efforts to ensure geographically equal access to cancer clinical trials in Korea.
Methods
Clinical trials registered between 2012 and 2023 in Korea were captured from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety database. To measure geographic disparity, we calculated the ratio of clinical trials conducted in local areas compared to those conducted in metropolitan areas and called it the trial geographical disparity index (TGDI). Regression analysis was used to analyze the annual trend of the TGDI.
Results
From 191 hospitals, 9424 cancer clinical trials were identified. The mean TGDI was 46%, indicating that cancer patients living in local areas can only access 46% of cancer clinical trials available to patients living in metropolitan areas. The disparities did not increase or decrease over 12 years. The situation varies among cancer sites, however. There was an improvement in the geographical disparity in lung cancer (p = 0.019), whereas a deterioration existed in pancreatic and prostate cancer (p = 0.035 and 0.016, respectively). Additionally, TGDI has worsened in clinical trials for domestically developed drugs (R-squared 0.58). In contrast, it has significantly improved for trials initiated by global pharmaceutical companies (R-squared 0.61), especially in lung and breast cancer (p = 0.016 and 0.005).
Conclusions
Although geographical disparities in access to cancer clinical trials seem to have been fixed in Korea, our data suggest that sponsor-initiated phase II/III trials conducted by global pharmaceutical companies may have a significant role in lowering the geographical barrier and ensuring equal access.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1727P - Barriers and facilitators of physician involvement in clinical oncology database management in Ukraine
Presenter: Inesa Huivaniuk
Session: Poster session 23
1728P - Implementation of a comprehensive oncology unit: Needs detected in cancer survivors during follow-up
Presenter: Francisco J Jimenez-ruiz
Session: Poster session 23
1729P - Targeted interventions in registration and reporting of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) in oncology help to improve tumor board decisions
Presenter: Lars Galonska
Session: Poster session 23
1730P - Dealing with digital paralysis: Surviving a cyberattack in a cancer centre
Presenter: Rachel J. Keogh
Session: Poster session 23
1731P - Providing access to anticancer drugs within an armed conflict: The experience of Mission Kharkiv (MK) and Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) in Ukraine
Presenter: Stanislav Polozov
Session: Poster session 23
1732P - War and the fragility of anticancer drug supply networks in Ukraine
Presenter: Olha Kostenchak-Svystak
Session: Poster session 23
1733P - Two wars at time: Fight against cancer during war time - experience of Ukraine
Presenter: Veronika Patsko
Session: Poster session 23
1734P - Early impact of a personalized lung cancer interception program for heavy smokers
Presenter: Pamela Abdayem
Session: Poster session 23
1735P - Impact of revised US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2021 lung cancer screening guideline on long-term cancer survivors in the United States
Presenter: Qian Wang
Session: Poster session 23
1736P - Young adult lung cancer demands more attention in a low-resource area: Bangladesh perspective
Presenter: Muhammad Rafiqul Islam
Session: Poster session 23