Abstract 1714P
Background
Ensuring equal opportunity to participate in clinical trials is important. We analyzed the effectiveness of efforts to ensure geographically equal access to cancer clinical trials in Korea.
Methods
Clinical trials registered between 2012 and 2023 in Korea were captured from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety database. To measure geographic disparity, we calculated the ratio of clinical trials conducted in local areas compared to those conducted in metropolitan areas and called it the trial geographical disparity index (TGDI). Regression analysis was used to analyze the annual trend of the TGDI.
Results
From 191 hospitals, 9424 cancer clinical trials were identified. The mean TGDI was 46%, indicating that cancer patients living in local areas can only access 46% of cancer clinical trials available to patients living in metropolitan areas. The disparities did not increase or decrease over 12 years. The situation varies among cancer sites, however. There was an improvement in the geographical disparity in lung cancer (p = 0.019), whereas a deterioration existed in pancreatic and prostate cancer (p = 0.035 and 0.016, respectively). Additionally, TGDI has worsened in clinical trials for domestically developed drugs (R-squared 0.58). In contrast, it has significantly improved for trials initiated by global pharmaceutical companies (R-squared 0.61), especially in lung and breast cancer (p = 0.016 and 0.005).
Conclusions
Although geographical disparities in access to cancer clinical trials seem to have been fixed in Korea, our data suggest that sponsor-initiated phase II/III trials conducted by global pharmaceutical companies may have a significant role in lowering the geographical barrier and ensuring equal access.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1890P - Switch-maintenance therapy with nivolumab in TKI-sensitive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Subgroup analysis for PD-L1 status of a randomized phase II study (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Christopher Darr
Session: Poster session 23
1891P - Determinants of exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Renee Saliby
Session: Poster session 23
1892P - A pooled meta-analysis of salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (N+I) after nivolumab (N) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Rana McKay
Session: Poster session 23
1895P - Time to treatment failure (TTF) and treatment beyond progression (TBP) in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts) receiving nivolumab: A survival outcome and a therapeutic strategy of clinical benefit (meet-uro 15)
Presenter: Sara Elena Rebuzzi
Session: Poster session 23
1896P - Clinical management and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with nivolumab+ipilimumab (N+I): A real-world study
Presenter: Tom Geldart
Session: Poster session 23
1897P - Geographical differences in the management of metastatic de novo renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune-combinations
Presenter: Francesco Massari
Session: Poster session 23
1899P - Comparative effectiveness of second-line (2L) treatment (Rx) with cabozantinib (cabo) in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) after first-line (1L) Rx with ipilimumab + nivolumab (ipi+nivo) vs. PD-1/L1 inhibitor (PDI) + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)
Presenter: Georges Gebrael
Session: Poster session 23
1900P - Role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) in the era of immunotherapy (IO): An analysis of the national cancer database (2004-2020)
Presenter: ALINA BASNET
Session: Poster session 23