Abstract 1714P
Background
Ensuring equal opportunity to participate in clinical trials is important. We analyzed the effectiveness of efforts to ensure geographically equal access to cancer clinical trials in Korea.
Methods
Clinical trials registered between 2012 and 2023 in Korea were captured from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety database. To measure geographic disparity, we calculated the ratio of clinical trials conducted in local areas compared to those conducted in metropolitan areas and called it the trial geographical disparity index (TGDI). Regression analysis was used to analyze the annual trend of the TGDI.
Results
From 191 hospitals, 9424 cancer clinical trials were identified. The mean TGDI was 46%, indicating that cancer patients living in local areas can only access 46% of cancer clinical trials available to patients living in metropolitan areas. The disparities did not increase or decrease over 12 years. The situation varies among cancer sites, however. There was an improvement in the geographical disparity in lung cancer (p = 0.019), whereas a deterioration existed in pancreatic and prostate cancer (p = 0.035 and 0.016, respectively). Additionally, TGDI has worsened in clinical trials for domestically developed drugs (R-squared 0.58). In contrast, it has significantly improved for trials initiated by global pharmaceutical companies (R-squared 0.61), especially in lung and breast cancer (p = 0.016 and 0.005).
Conclusions
Although geographical disparities in access to cancer clinical trials seem to have been fixed in Korea, our data suggest that sponsor-initiated phase II/III trials conducted by global pharmaceutical companies may have a significant role in lowering the geographical barrier and ensuring equal access.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1717P - Management of patients during a digital healthcare record system transition: A phase I unit experience
Presenter: Lyra Del Rosario
Session: Poster session 23
1718P - Impact of the economic status of the patient's country of residence on the outcome of oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Saki Nishiyama
Session: Poster session 23
1719P - Decentralized clinical trials: Is there a space in Italy?
Presenter: Celeste Cagnazzo
Session: Poster session 23
1720P - Experience in the provision of oncology services immediately after a major disaster
Presenter: Burak Aktas
Session: Poster session 23
1721P - Self-assessment tool and best-practice sharing to support hospitals in improving the quality of multi-disciplinary teams in lung cancer care
Presenter: Ernest Nadal
Session: Poster session 23
1722P - Factors contributing to differences in evidence compliance rate in cancer treatment among second opinion cases
Presenter: Tomomi Sanomachi
Session: Poster session 23
1723P - Improving access to molecular tumour boards for complex genomic profiles: A healthcare policy from the Netherlands
Presenter: Sahar van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani
Session: Poster session 23
1724P - Improving access to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment through navigation: Evaluation of a one-year pilot project in Botswana
Presenter: Ariane Migeotte
Session: Poster session 23
1725P - Genetic counselling for cancer in EU member states: Review and foundation for consensus recommendations
Presenter: J. Matt McCrary
Session: Poster session 23
1726P - Optimizing oncology drug spending in a cancer centre in Ireland
Presenter: Ruth Kieran
Session: Poster session 23