Abstract 1714P
Background
Ensuring equal opportunity to participate in clinical trials is important. We analyzed the effectiveness of efforts to ensure geographically equal access to cancer clinical trials in Korea.
Methods
Clinical trials registered between 2012 and 2023 in Korea were captured from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety database. To measure geographic disparity, we calculated the ratio of clinical trials conducted in local areas compared to those conducted in metropolitan areas and called it the trial geographical disparity index (TGDI). Regression analysis was used to analyze the annual trend of the TGDI.
Results
From 191 hospitals, 9424 cancer clinical trials were identified. The mean TGDI was 46%, indicating that cancer patients living in local areas can only access 46% of cancer clinical trials available to patients living in metropolitan areas. The disparities did not increase or decrease over 12 years. The situation varies among cancer sites, however. There was an improvement in the geographical disparity in lung cancer (p = 0.019), whereas a deterioration existed in pancreatic and prostate cancer (p = 0.035 and 0.016, respectively). Additionally, TGDI has worsened in clinical trials for domestically developed drugs (R-squared 0.58). In contrast, it has significantly improved for trials initiated by global pharmaceutical companies (R-squared 0.61), especially in lung and breast cancer (p = 0.016 and 0.005).
Conclusions
Although geographical disparities in access to cancer clinical trials seem to have been fixed in Korea, our data suggest that sponsor-initiated phase II/III trials conducted by global pharmaceutical companies may have a significant role in lowering the geographical barrier and ensuring equal access.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1737P - Use of the predictive risk model LungFlagTM for lung cancer screening in screening in a Spanish reference center: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Presenter: Maria Eugenia Olmedo Garcia
Session: Poster session 23
1738P - Impact of digital platforms on exposure to tobacco and new smoking devices: A survey approach
Presenter: Diego de Haro
Session: Poster session 23
1739P - Lung cancer mortality patterns of tobacco users in the United States: A 21-year analysis (1999-2020)
Presenter: Seif Bugazia
Session: Poster session 23
1740P - Geolocation of respiratory tract cancer and its relationship with chronic exposure to PM2.5 pollutants
Presenter: Moisés González-Escamilla
Session: Poster session 23
1741P - Are physicians aware of lung cancer screening benefits and the importance of implementing this? Data from two public hospitals in Buenos Aires province, Argentina
Presenter: Valentin Vidal
Session: Poster session 23
1742P - Gender differences in incidence trends of early-onset GI cancer: The European perspective
Presenter: Irit Ben-Aharon
Session: Poster session 23
1743P - Bridging the gender gap in oncology: GEORGiNA'S quest for equality in academic research
Presenter: Khalid El Bairi
Session: Poster session 23
1744P - Socioeconomic inequalities in the diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer: A population-based English cancer registry study
Presenter: Benjamin Pickwell-Smith
Session: Poster session 23
1745P - Why do adult patients with cancer abandon treatment in India? A nationwide qualitative study to understand the perspectives of healthcare workers
Presenter: Reshma Ayiraveetil
Session: Poster session 23
1746P - Unintended consequences: Working time directives and oncology staff implications
Presenter: Simon Barry
Session: Poster session 23