Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 23

1714P - Geographical disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in Korea

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 23

Topics

Cancer Prevention

Tumour Site

Presenters

Sokbom Kang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S925-S953. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01945-2

Authors

S. Kang1, M. Kim2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Ilsan-gu Madu-dong, National Cancer Center Hospital, 05502 - Goyang/KR
  • 2 Gyencologic Oncology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, 01812 - Seoul/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1714P

Background

Ensuring equal opportunity to participate in clinical trials is important. We analyzed the effectiveness of efforts to ensure geographically equal access to cancer clinical trials in Korea.

Methods

Clinical trials registered between 2012 and 2023 in Korea were captured from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety database. To measure geographic disparity, we calculated the ratio of clinical trials conducted in local areas compared to those conducted in metropolitan areas and called it the trial geographical disparity index (TGDI). Regression analysis was used to analyze the annual trend of the TGDI.

Results

From 191 hospitals, 9424 cancer clinical trials were identified. The mean TGDI was 46%, indicating that cancer patients living in local areas can only access 46% of cancer clinical trials available to patients living in metropolitan areas. The disparities did not increase or decrease over 12 years. The situation varies among cancer sites, however. There was an improvement in the geographical disparity in lung cancer (p = 0.019), whereas a deterioration existed in pancreatic and prostate cancer (p = 0.035 and 0.016, respectively). Additionally, TGDI has worsened in clinical trials for domestically developed drugs (R-squared 0.58). In contrast, it has significantly improved for trials initiated by global pharmaceutical companies (R-squared 0.61), especially in lung and breast cancer (p = 0.016 and 0.005).

Conclusions

Although geographical disparities in access to cancer clinical trials seem to have been fixed in Korea, our data suggest that sponsor-initiated phase II/III trials conducted by global pharmaceutical companies may have a significant role in lowering the geographical barrier and ensuring equal access.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.