Abstract 1202P
Background
There is no consensus on the second-line regimen for pts with progressive NEC. These patients (pts) generally have poor performance status (PS) and low tolerance to combination therapy. Metronomic TMZ showed, in retrospective trials, a good safety and efficacy profile. This trial aims to assess the efficacy of TMZ given every other week in pts with advanced platinum-pretreated grade 3 (G3) poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and NEC.
Methods
TENEC is an open-label, non-randomized, phase II trial that recruited pts with platinum-pre-treated metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Pts received 75 mg/m2/day of TMZ for 7 days followed by 7 days of no treatment (regimen 1 week on/1 week off). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability.
Results
From 2017 to 2020, 38 pts were enrolled. The median age of enrolled pts was 61.5 years (25–77). Two pts (5.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS score of 0, 58% had an ECOG PS score of 1, 34% had an ECOG PS score of 2 and 3% had an ECOG PS score of 3. Among the pts with determined Ki67, 33.3% had a Ki67 index <55%, and 66.6% had Ki67 index ≥55%. Thirteen pts (34%) had metastases in a single site, 12 pts (31%) had two different sites of metastasis, and six pts (15%) had metastases in three or more sites. ORR was 18%, including one complete response and six partial responses. The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.1–14.5), and the median OS was 12 months (95% CI: 5.6–20.8). The 1-year PFS rate was 37%. No statistically significant difference in median OS (p=0.81, hazard ratio [HR] 95% CI: 0.5–1.9) and median PFS (p=0.85, HR 95% CI: 0.4–2) was observed among pts with Ki67 <55% vs ≥55%. Nausea, diarrhoea and abdominal pain were the most common adverse.
Conclusions
One-week-on/one-week-off TMZ shows promising activity in pts with NEN G3 and NEC. The excellent safety profile confirmed the possibility of using this scheme in pts with poor performance status. Randomised trials are warranted to confirm treatment benefits showed in this trial.
Clinical trial identification
EudraCT 2016-005238-31; NCT04122911.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Salvatore Tafuto.
Funding
Has not received any fundingˆ.
Disclosure
C. von Arx: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Receipt of consultation fees:Participation in a company sponsored speaker’s bureau: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pierre-Fabre, Gentili, Lilly, Novartis, Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference Fee and travel grant: Organon; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference fee and travel grant: AAA. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1109P - Second-line pembrolizumab (pembro) in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Long-term follow-up of the phase I KEYNOTE-151 study
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster session 13
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13