Abstract 1202P
Background
There is no consensus on the second-line regimen for pts with progressive NEC. These patients (pts) generally have poor performance status (PS) and low tolerance to combination therapy. Metronomic TMZ showed, in retrospective trials, a good safety and efficacy profile. This trial aims to assess the efficacy of TMZ given every other week in pts with advanced platinum-pretreated grade 3 (G3) poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and NEC.
Methods
TENEC is an open-label, non-randomized, phase II trial that recruited pts with platinum-pre-treated metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Pts received 75 mg/m2/day of TMZ for 7 days followed by 7 days of no treatment (regimen 1 week on/1 week off). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability.
Results
From 2017 to 2020, 38 pts were enrolled. The median age of enrolled pts was 61.5 years (25–77). Two pts (5.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS score of 0, 58% had an ECOG PS score of 1, 34% had an ECOG PS score of 2 and 3% had an ECOG PS score of 3. Among the pts with determined Ki67, 33.3% had a Ki67 index <55%, and 66.6% had Ki67 index ≥55%. Thirteen pts (34%) had metastases in a single site, 12 pts (31%) had two different sites of metastasis, and six pts (15%) had metastases in three or more sites. ORR was 18%, including one complete response and six partial responses. The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.1–14.5), and the median OS was 12 months (95% CI: 5.6–20.8). The 1-year PFS rate was 37%. No statistically significant difference in median OS (p=0.81, hazard ratio [HR] 95% CI: 0.5–1.9) and median PFS (p=0.85, HR 95% CI: 0.4–2) was observed among pts with Ki67 <55% vs ≥55%. Nausea, diarrhoea and abdominal pain were the most common adverse.
Conclusions
One-week-on/one-week-off TMZ shows promising activity in pts with NEN G3 and NEC. The excellent safety profile confirmed the possibility of using this scheme in pts with poor performance status. Randomised trials are warranted to confirm treatment benefits showed in this trial.
Clinical trial identification
EudraCT 2016-005238-31; NCT04122911.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Salvatore Tafuto.
Funding
Has not received any fundingˆ.
Disclosure
C. von Arx: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Receipt of consultation fees:Participation in a company sponsored speaker’s bureau: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pierre-Fabre, Gentili, Lilly, Novartis, Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference Fee and travel grant: Organon; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference fee and travel grant: AAA. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1129P - Effect of subsequent therapies including checkpoint inhibitors on overall survival in a phase III randomized trial of tebentafusp in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma: Long-term follow-up
Presenter: Marlana Orloff
Session: Poster session 13
1130P - Tebentafusp (tebe) in an ongoing cohort of 72 French patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM)
Presenter: Leah Mailly-Giacchetti
Session: Poster session 13
1131P - Management of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) patients on tebentafusp in a real-world setting
Presenter: Mauricio Fernando Ribeiro
Session: Poster session 13
1132P - Chemokine expression in uveal melanoma and association with tumor genetics and response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Aparna Nallagangula
Session: Poster session 13
1133P - SF3B1 mutation predicts improved overall survival in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: Molecular and clinical correlates
Presenter: Luis del Carpio Huerta
Session: Poster session 13
1134P - Safety and efficacy of low dose (LD) ipilimumab (Ipi) + pembrolizumab (pem) in checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) naïve patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM)
Presenter: Isabella Glitza
Session: Poster session 13
1135P - Comparison of intracranial (IC) response assessment criteria in patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with combination nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) in CheckMate 204
Presenter: Raymond Huang
Session: Poster session 13
1136P - Regorafenib combined with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors for the treatment of refractory melanoma brain metastases
Presenter: Iris Dirven
Session: Poster session 13
1138P - Intralesional administration of L19IL2/L19TNF in difficult-to-treat non-melanoma skin cancer shows a favorable safety profile and preliminary clinical activity
Presenter: Lukas Flatz
Session: Poster session 13