Abstract 1202P
Background
There is no consensus on the second-line regimen for pts with progressive NEC. These patients (pts) generally have poor performance status (PS) and low tolerance to combination therapy. Metronomic TMZ showed, in retrospective trials, a good safety and efficacy profile. This trial aims to assess the efficacy of TMZ given every other week in pts with advanced platinum-pretreated grade 3 (G3) poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and NEC.
Methods
TENEC is an open-label, non-randomized, phase II trial that recruited pts with platinum-pre-treated metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Pts received 75 mg/m2/day of TMZ for 7 days followed by 7 days of no treatment (regimen 1 week on/1 week off). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability.
Results
From 2017 to 2020, 38 pts were enrolled. The median age of enrolled pts was 61.5 years (25–77). Two pts (5.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS score of 0, 58% had an ECOG PS score of 1, 34% had an ECOG PS score of 2 and 3% had an ECOG PS score of 3. Among the pts with determined Ki67, 33.3% had a Ki67 index <55%, and 66.6% had Ki67 index ≥55%. Thirteen pts (34%) had metastases in a single site, 12 pts (31%) had two different sites of metastasis, and six pts (15%) had metastases in three or more sites. ORR was 18%, including one complete response and six partial responses. The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.1–14.5), and the median OS was 12 months (95% CI: 5.6–20.8). The 1-year PFS rate was 37%. No statistically significant difference in median OS (p=0.81, hazard ratio [HR] 95% CI: 0.5–1.9) and median PFS (p=0.85, HR 95% CI: 0.4–2) was observed among pts with Ki67 <55% vs ≥55%. Nausea, diarrhoea and abdominal pain were the most common adverse.
Conclusions
One-week-on/one-week-off TMZ shows promising activity in pts with NEN G3 and NEC. The excellent safety profile confirmed the possibility of using this scheme in pts with poor performance status. Randomised trials are warranted to confirm treatment benefits showed in this trial.
Clinical trial identification
EudraCT 2016-005238-31; NCT04122911.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Salvatore Tafuto.
Funding
Has not received any fundingˆ.
Disclosure
C. von Arx: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Receipt of consultation fees:Participation in a company sponsored speaker’s bureau: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pierre-Fabre, Gentili, Lilly, Novartis, Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference Fee and travel grant: Organon; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Conference fee and travel grant: AAA. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1119P - Stage IIIA melanoma with isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes: Time for reviewing the AJCC v8 classification
Presenter: Teresa Amaral
Session: Poster session 13
1120P - Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model to predict recurrence-free survival and melanoma-specific survival in patients with melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy
Presenter: Robert Stassen
Session: Poster session 13
1121P - Interferon-gamma (IFNy) gene signature as a predictive biomarker for response in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) low advanced melanoma patients
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1122P - Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and systemic inflammatory index as prognostic biomarkers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune checkpoint inhibitors: Could any of them be used?
Presenter: Maria Menezes
Session: Poster session 13
1123P - Baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to immune checkpoint inhibition in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Mark Schuiveling
Session: Poster session 13
1124P - IL-6 as prognostic factor in adjuvant or metastatic skin cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: A deep biomarker analysis
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster session 13
1125P - Identification of a subset of metastatic melanoma patients demonstrating germline determined insensitivity to immunotherapy
Presenter: Benjamin Fairfax
Session: Poster session 13
1126P - REtrospective Study of definitive therapy for head and neck mUcosal MElanoma: The RESUME study
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster session 13
1127P - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced mucosal melanoma (MM): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: James Pham
Session: Poster session 13
1128P - A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of FHD-286, a novel BRG1/BRM (SMARCA4/SMARCA2) inhibitor, for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Sapna Patel
Session: Poster session 13