Abstract 1114P
Background
Combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in phase III clinical trials, and is standard of care for advanced/metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma. However there is limited evidence in the real-world.
Methods
BECARE is a retrospective study of EB in unresectable advanced/metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma in 21 sites from Spain. The study includes melanoma patients (pts) treated according to standard clinical practice with EB in the 1st or after progression to a 1st line with immune checkpoint inhibitors (IT) for advanced or metastatic stage. Previous BRAF- and/or MEK- inhibitor (other than adjuvant ended ≥ 6 m before EB) or chemotherapy was not allowed. The primary objective is to characterize the population of pts receiving EB and assess treatment efficacy and tolerability in the real world.
Results
From Sep 2021 to Mar 2023, 117 pts were included. Median age was 59 years (range: 23-89), 59.8% were male, 64.1% had ECOG 0, all pts had metastasis at inclusion, and 21.4% brain metastasis. LDH was elevated in 35.9% of pts. The median follow-up was 13.1 m (95% CI: 11.4-15.1). EB was administered as the 2nd line after IT in 28 (23.9%) pts. The median PFS and OS for pts with brain metastasis treated with EB in the 1st line was 6.3 m (95% CI: 6.2-12) and 10 m (95% CI: 7.4-NR), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 were reported in 17 (14.5%) pts, being the most common elevated liver enzymes (6%), diarrhea (2.6%) and fatigue (1.7%). Creatinine was increased in 3 (2.6%) pts, and eye disorders present in 6 (5.1%). EB was administered for a median of 10.7 m (95% CI: 8.2-12.6) and required dose reductions or interruptions due to AEs in 29 (24.8%) and 37 (31.6%) pts, respectively. Treatment was ended due to toxicity in 6 (5.1%) pts. Table: 1114P
EB treatment | ORR; n (%) | median PFS (95% CI); months | median OS (95% CI); months |
1 st line | 63 (75) | 12 (9.4-21.6) | 24.6 (14.8-NR) |
2 nd line after IT | 21 (77.8) | 12.5 (6.6-NR) | 13.9 (10.5-NR) |
Conclusions
EB confirmed efficacy in the real-world including pts with worse prognosis than clinical trials. EB is also a feasible option after IT. Toxicity consistent with previous experience.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Mfar Clinical Research staff for their assistance in the development of this abstract.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Melanoma (GEM).
Funding
Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Melanoma (GEM) as Sponsor with Industry partner Pierre Fabre Ibérica.
Disclosure
A. Soria: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi. S. Sequero: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Gilead. T. Puértolas: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Bristol, Immunocore, Novartis, Seagen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodation, Expenses: Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre. J. Fra Rodríguez: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, GSK, Pierre Fabre, Servier, BMS, PharmaMar, AAA. C. Aguayo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria for Continuous Medical Education: Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Roche. G. Benítez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck, AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Pierre Fabre. P. Ayala de Miguel: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, BMS. E. Muñoz-Couselo: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Roche. B. Campos: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Rovi, Leo Pharma, Sun Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1130P - Tebentafusp (tebe) in an ongoing cohort of 72 French patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM)
Presenter: Leah Mailly-Giacchetti
Session: Poster session 13
1131P - Management of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) patients on tebentafusp in a real-world setting
Presenter: Mauricio Fernando Ribeiro
Session: Poster session 13
1132P - Chemokine expression in uveal melanoma and association with tumor genetics and response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Aparna Nallagangula
Session: Poster session 13
1133P - SF3B1 mutation predicts improved overall survival in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: Molecular and clinical correlates
Presenter: Luis del Carpio Huerta
Session: Poster session 13
1134P - Safety and efficacy of low dose (LD) ipilimumab (Ipi) + pembrolizumab (pem) in checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) naïve patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM)
Presenter: Isabella Glitza
Session: Poster session 13
1135P - Comparison of intracranial (IC) response assessment criteria in patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with combination nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) in CheckMate 204
Presenter: Raymond Huang
Session: Poster session 13
1136P - Regorafenib combined with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors for the treatment of refractory melanoma brain metastases
Presenter: Iris Dirven
Session: Poster session 13
1138P - Intralesional administration of L19IL2/L19TNF in difficult-to-treat non-melanoma skin cancer shows a favorable safety profile and preliminary clinical activity
Presenter: Lukas Flatz
Session: Poster session 13
1139P - Final results of a phase II study of pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCCs)
Presenter: Eve Maubec
Session: Poster session 13