Abstract 1114P
Background
Combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in phase III clinical trials, and is standard of care for advanced/metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma. However there is limited evidence in the real-world.
Methods
BECARE is a retrospective study of EB in unresectable advanced/metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma in 21 sites from Spain. The study includes melanoma patients (pts) treated according to standard clinical practice with EB in the 1st or after progression to a 1st line with immune checkpoint inhibitors (IT) for advanced or metastatic stage. Previous BRAF- and/or MEK- inhibitor (other than adjuvant ended ≥ 6 m before EB) or chemotherapy was not allowed. The primary objective is to characterize the population of pts receiving EB and assess treatment efficacy and tolerability in the real world.
Results
From Sep 2021 to Mar 2023, 117 pts were included. Median age was 59 years (range: 23-89), 59.8% were male, 64.1% had ECOG 0, all pts had metastasis at inclusion, and 21.4% brain metastasis. LDH was elevated in 35.9% of pts. The median follow-up was 13.1 m (95% CI: 11.4-15.1). EB was administered as the 2nd line after IT in 28 (23.9%) pts. The median PFS and OS for pts with brain metastasis treated with EB in the 1st line was 6.3 m (95% CI: 6.2-12) and 10 m (95% CI: 7.4-NR), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 were reported in 17 (14.5%) pts, being the most common elevated liver enzymes (6%), diarrhea (2.6%) and fatigue (1.7%). Creatinine was increased in 3 (2.6%) pts, and eye disorders present in 6 (5.1%). EB was administered for a median of 10.7 m (95% CI: 8.2-12.6) and required dose reductions or interruptions due to AEs in 29 (24.8%) and 37 (31.6%) pts, respectively. Treatment was ended due to toxicity in 6 (5.1%) pts. Table: 1114P
EB treatment | ORR; n (%) | median PFS (95% CI); months | median OS (95% CI); months |
1 st line | 63 (75) | 12 (9.4-21.6) | 24.6 (14.8-NR) |
2 nd line after IT | 21 (77.8) | 12.5 (6.6-NR) | 13.9 (10.5-NR) |
Conclusions
EB confirmed efficacy in the real-world including pts with worse prognosis than clinical trials. EB is also a feasible option after IT. Toxicity consistent with previous experience.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Mfar Clinical Research staff for their assistance in the development of this abstract.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Melanoma (GEM).
Funding
Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Melanoma (GEM) as Sponsor with Industry partner Pierre Fabre Ibérica.
Disclosure
A. Soria: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi. S. Sequero: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Gilead. T. Puértolas: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Bristol, Immunocore, Novartis, Seagen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodation, Expenses: Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre. J. Fra Rodríguez: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, GSK, Pierre Fabre, Servier, BMS, PharmaMar, AAA. C. Aguayo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria for Continuous Medical Education: Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Roche. G. Benítez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck, AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Pierre Fabre. P. Ayala de Miguel: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, BMS. E. Muñoz-Couselo: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Roche. B. Campos: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Rovi, Leo Pharma, Sun Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1198P - Phase Ib portion of the ACTION-1 phase Ib/3 trial of RYZ101 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) progressing after 177Lu somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy: Safety and efficacy findings
Presenter: Jonathan Strosberg
Session: Poster session 13
1199P - MAVERIC: Phase II randomized study of everolimus as maintenance therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (mNEN) with pulmonary or gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) origin. Results on behalf of the GOIRC
Presenter: Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Session: Poster session 13
1200P - A phase II single-arm interventional trial evaluating the activity and safety of CABOzantinib (CBZ) plus TEMozolomide (TMZ) in lung and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) progressed after SSA therapy, everolimus, sunitinib or PRRT: CABOTEM Trial
Presenter: oOttavia Clemente
Session: Poster session 13
1201P - Evaluation of efficacy TEMCAP regiment as first-line or further line therapy in patients with advanced, unresectable, progressive GEP-NET. Real-world data
Presenter: Agnieszka Kolasinska-Cwikla
Session: Poster session 13
1202P - Final analysis of TENEC trial: A phase II trial of temozolomide (TMZ) as second-line treatment for advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in patients (pts) with a poor performance status (PS)
Presenter: Claudia von Arx
Session: Poster session 13