Abstract 1114P
Background
Combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in phase III clinical trials, and is standard of care for advanced/metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma. However there is limited evidence in the real-world.
Methods
BECARE is a retrospective study of EB in unresectable advanced/metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma in 21 sites from Spain. The study includes melanoma patients (pts) treated according to standard clinical practice with EB in the 1st or after progression to a 1st line with immune checkpoint inhibitors (IT) for advanced or metastatic stage. Previous BRAF- and/or MEK- inhibitor (other than adjuvant ended ≥ 6 m before EB) or chemotherapy was not allowed. The primary objective is to characterize the population of pts receiving EB and assess treatment efficacy and tolerability in the real world.
Results
From Sep 2021 to Mar 2023, 117 pts were included. Median age was 59 years (range: 23-89), 59.8% were male, 64.1% had ECOG 0, all pts had metastasis at inclusion, and 21.4% brain metastasis. LDH was elevated in 35.9% of pts. The median follow-up was 13.1 m (95% CI: 11.4-15.1). EB was administered as the 2nd line after IT in 28 (23.9%) pts. The median PFS and OS for pts with brain metastasis treated with EB in the 1st line was 6.3 m (95% CI: 6.2-12) and 10 m (95% CI: 7.4-NR), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 were reported in 17 (14.5%) pts, being the most common elevated liver enzymes (6%), diarrhea (2.6%) and fatigue (1.7%). Creatinine was increased in 3 (2.6%) pts, and eye disorders present in 6 (5.1%). EB was administered for a median of 10.7 m (95% CI: 8.2-12.6) and required dose reductions or interruptions due to AEs in 29 (24.8%) and 37 (31.6%) pts, respectively. Treatment was ended due to toxicity in 6 (5.1%) pts. Table: 1114P
EB treatment | ORR; n (%) | median PFS (95% CI); months | median OS (95% CI); months |
1 st line | 63 (75) | 12 (9.4-21.6) | 24.6 (14.8-NR) |
2 nd line after IT | 21 (77.8) | 12.5 (6.6-NR) | 13.9 (10.5-NR) |
Conclusions
EB confirmed efficacy in the real-world including pts with worse prognosis than clinical trials. EB is also a feasible option after IT. Toxicity consistent with previous experience.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Mfar Clinical Research staff for their assistance in the development of this abstract.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Melanoma (GEM).
Funding
Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Melanoma (GEM) as Sponsor with Industry partner Pierre Fabre Ibérica.
Disclosure
A. Soria: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi. S. Sequero: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Gilead. T. Puértolas: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Bristol, Immunocore, Novartis, Seagen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodation, Expenses: Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre. J. Fra Rodríguez: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, GSK, Pierre Fabre, Servier, BMS, PharmaMar, AAA. C. Aguayo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria for Continuous Medical Education: Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Roche. G. Benítez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck, AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Pierre Fabre. P. Ayala de Miguel: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, BMS. E. Muñoz-Couselo: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Roche. B. Campos: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Rovi, Leo Pharma, Sun Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1171P - Evaluation of the transcriptomic presence of tumor associated antigens (TAAs) from antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and PD-L1 in melanoma: Options for new clinical opportunities
Presenter: Jorge Bartolome
Session: Poster session 13
1172P - Analysis of the microbiome of metastatic melanoma patients with complete response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Marin Golcic
Session: Poster session 13
1173P - NRAS mutation as an independent prognostic factor for resectable Chinese acral melanoma
Presenter: Yu Xu
Session: Poster session 13
1174P - Sex differences in advanced melanoma in Spain: Results from the prospective real-world study GEM 1801
Presenter: Eva Muñoz Couselo
Session: Poster session 13
1175P - Return to work after neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma patients
Presenter: Judith Lijnsvelt
Session: Poster session 13
1176P - Planned drug holidays during immunotherapy in advanced and metastatic melanoma patients: A nation-wide study
Presenter: Anna Czarnecka
Session: Poster session 13
1177P - Assessment of tumour burden reduction per photography vs magnetic resonance imaging in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma receiving sonidegib 200 mg
Presenter: Ralf Gutzmer
Session: Poster session 13
1178P - Melanoma incidence rises for pediatrics: 15-year nationwide retrospective cohort study in Korea (2004-2019)
Presenter: Jisu Oh
Session: Poster session 13
1179P - The underestimated skin cancer risk after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis of 147154 patients
Presenter: Amr Ehab El-Qushayri
Session: Poster session 13