Abstract 782P
Background
CRS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and gBRCA status predict survival outcomes of women diagnosed with advanced HGSOC. We investigated the correlation between CRS and gBRCA to understand the potential of CRS as an inexpensive biomarker for PARPi therapy.
Methods
Analysis of the OC gBRCA testing database from a tertiary referral centre. Eligible criteria included women with FIGO stage IIIC/IV HGSOC who received NACT and had gBRCA tested between 01/09/2017 and 31/12/2022. Univariable and Multivariable (MV) Cox Proportional-Hazards Models were applied to assess the association between PFS, OS and clinical factors. Two-Proportions Z Test was applied to assess the proportions of CRS1+2 or CRS3 between gBRCA.
Results
536 women were eligible. Mean age 66 years (range 36–89). 139 had FIGO stage IVB HGSOC. 71% received 3-weekly carboplatin with paclitaxel. Median PFS was 14.4 months (95%CI 13.6–15.4) and OS 38.0 months (95%CI 34.8–42.6) in the overall population. Performance status (0–1 vs. 2–4), cytoreductive surgery (Yes vs. No) and gBRCA status (mutant[MT] vs. wild type[WT]) were predictive (PFS) and prognostic (OS) in the overall population (all P<0.05). 363 women underwent delayed primary surgery (DPS) and had a CRS. Of these, 90% received 3–4 cycles of NACT and 96% had optimal (≤1 cm) cytoreduction. In the NACT-DPS group, MV analysis showed that residual disease (≤1 vs. >1 cm), CRS (3 vs. 1+2) and gBRCA status (MT vs. WT) were predictive (PFS) (all P≤0.02). Proportion testing showed women with gBRCA2 were more likely to have CRS3 vs. CRS1+2 than those with gBRCA1 (P=0.008). Women with gBRCA1 (P=0.075) and gBRCA2 (P=0.078) were not more likely to have CRS3 vs. CRS1+2 then those with WT.
Conclusions
We found a correlation between CRS3 and gBRCA2, but not gBRCA1, in women with FIGO stage IIIC/IV HGSOC treated with NACT-DPS. CRS should be evaluated in a prospective study as a predictor of PARPi efficacy.
Table: 782P
CRS | gBRCA1 | gBRCA2 | WT | PFS, months (95%CI) |
1 | 7 | 1 | 60 | 12.1 (11.5–15.7) |
2 | 19 | 9 | 146 | 15.4 (14.4–16.7) |
1+2 | 26 (84%) | 10 (45%) | 206 (66%) | 14.9 (14.0–16.0) |
3 | 5 (16%) | 12 (55%) | 104 (34%) | 22.8 (20.7–27.9) |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
R.D. Morgan.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
628P - Immunotherapy in mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Long-term outcome and novel predictive markers
Presenter: Amos Stemmer
Session: Poster session 11
629P - First results of the french prospective cohort of colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability (COLOMIN2)
Presenter: David Tougeron
Session: Poster session 11
630P - Determining a prognostic score using imaging to assess the benefit of combo anti-PD1 + anti-CTL4 vs anti-PD1 in patients with metastatic MSI/dMMR colorectal cancer (mCRC MSI)
Presenter: Remy Barbe
Session: Poster session 11
631P - Using the unique somatic mutation profile of POLE loss of proof-reading mutation helps in selection of patients who may benefit from immunotherapy
Presenter: Giulia Maddalena
Session: Poster session 11
632P - Predictive value of C-reactive protein (CRP) in microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients given first-line alternating short-course oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FLOX) and nivolumab
Presenter: Sebastian Meltzer
Session: Poster session 11
633P - Genomic alterations in SPEN predict outcome of immune checkpoint therapy in gastrointestinal cancer
Presenter: Changxiong Wu
Session: Poster session 11
634P - The ave-rec phase II trial of PD-L1/PD-1 blockade with avelumab plus chemoradiotherapy for resectable ESMO high risk rectal cancers
Presenter: Michael Michael
Session: Poster session 11
635P - Avelumab (AVE) combined with cetuximab (CET) and irinotecan (IRI) for the treatment of refractory microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The AVETUXIRI phase II study
Presenter: Marc van den Eynde
Session: Poster session 11