Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 11

635P - Avelumab (AVE) combined with cetuximab (CET) and irinotecan (IRI) for the treatment of refractory microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The AVETUXIRI phase II study

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 11

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Marc van den Eynde

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S410-S457. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01935-X

Authors

M. van den Eynde1, N. Huyghe2, I. Sinapi3, A. De Cuyper4, E. Verstraelen5, P. Goffette6, B. Ghaye6, M. Papier7, D. Bedognetti8, A. van Maanen9, M. Castella5, J. Galon10, J. Carrasco7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Digestive Oncology Department, Institut Roi Albert II - Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc - UCLouvain, 1200 - Woluwe-Saint-Lambert/BE
  • 2 Digestive Oncology Department, Institut Roi Albert II - Cliniques universitaires St-Luc, 1200 - Bruxelles/BE
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Grand Hopital de Charleroi Site Notre Dame, 6000 - Charleroi/BE
  • 4 Department Of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (UCLouvain Saint-Luc), 1200 - Woluwe-Saint-Lambert/BE
  • 5 Medical Oncology Department, Institut Roi Albert II - Cliniques universitaires St-Luc, 1200 - Brussels/BE
  • 6 Radiology, Institut Roi Albert II - Cliniques universitaires St-Luc, 1200 - Brussels/BE
  • 7 Medical Oncology Department, GHdC - Grand Hopital de Charleroi - Site Notre Dame, 6000 - Charleroi/BE
  • 8 Research Oncology, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Al-Rayyan/QA
  • 9 Biostatistics, Institut Roi Albert II - Cliniques universitaires St-Luc, 1200 - Brussels/BE
  • 10 Cordeliers Research Center, Inserm Team 15, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, 75006 - Paris/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 635P

Background

Cetuximab could mediate, independently from RAS mutation, an immunogenic tumor cell death and antitumor immune response. This trial explores the efficacy and safety of AVE, CET and IRI for the treatment of refractory MSS mCRC.

Methods

Chemo-refractory (+anti-EGFR refractory if RAS wt) MSS, mCRC patients (pts) were enrolled in 3 cohorts (A: RAS wt, B & C: RAS mut) and treated with CET (500 mg/m2/Q2W), IRI (150 mg/m2/Q2W) and AVE (10 mg/kg/Q2W). Primary endpoints were safety, overall response rate (ORR) (cohorts A-B) and 6 months progression-free survival rate (6m-PFSR) (cohort C). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), PFS, OS and immunoscore (IS) biomarker. Based on a Simon 2-stage design (α=0.1; β=0.2) for ORR (cohorts A: P0/P1=0.15/0.33 – B: P0/P1=0.09/0.25) and 6m-PFSR (cohort C: P0/P1=0.15/0.31), 10+18 (A); 13+15 (B) and 14+25 (C) pts were needed. At least 2+5 (A); 2+3 (B) and 3+6 (C) pts must reach ORR (A-B) or 6m-PFSR (C) for efficacy objectives. Immunofluorescence (CD3, CD8 densities) was performed on baseline metastasis biopsies to generate IS.

Results

57 pts (median 62 yrs, 73.7% male, 84.2% left-sided, 86.0% synchr. mCRC) were included and 55 pts treated. Any treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) grade >=3 occurred in 35 pts (63.6%; diarrhea in 11 pts, 20.0%). Immune-related AEs grade >=3 appeared in 2 pts (3.6%; 1 acute kidney injury, 1 cholangitis). Efficacy results are summarized.

Table: 635P

Characteristics Cohort A (n=28) Cohort B (n=13) Cohort C (n=14)
ORR, % (pts) 21.4% (6/28) 0.0% (0/13) 0.0% (0/14)
DCR, % (pts) 50.0% (14/28) 61.5% (8/13) 42.9% (6/14)
6m-PFSR, % (pts) 25.0% (7/28) 38.5% (5/13) 7.1% (1/14)
Median PFS, months (95%CI) 3.6 (2.5-5.6) 3.7 (2.7-6.4) 2.8 (2.4-3.8)
Median OS, months (95%CI) 11.4 (5.3-15.6) 10.1 (6.0-22.8) 6.8 (5.3-9.7)

Independently of RAS mutation, high IS was associated with greater tumor shrinkage (OR=8.3, p<0.01), DCR (OR=8.0, p=0.05), PFS (median 7.1 vs 3.1 months; HR=0.29, p<0.01) and OS (median 12.9 vs 7.2 months; HR=0.62, p=0.19).

Conclusions

Despite good tolerability, AVETUXIRI trial did not reach its efficacy endpoint. IS could be a predictive biomarker for selecting patients with potential treatment benefits.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03608046.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Institut Roi Albert II - Cliniques universitaires St-Luc.

Funding

Merck Serono.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.