Abstract 782P
Background
CRS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and gBRCA status predict survival outcomes of women diagnosed with advanced HGSOC. We investigated the correlation between CRS and gBRCA to understand the potential of CRS as an inexpensive biomarker for PARPi therapy.
Methods
Analysis of the OC gBRCA testing database from a tertiary referral centre. Eligible criteria included women with FIGO stage IIIC/IV HGSOC who received NACT and had gBRCA tested between 01/09/2017 and 31/12/2022. Univariable and Multivariable (MV) Cox Proportional-Hazards Models were applied to assess the association between PFS, OS and clinical factors. Two-Proportions Z Test was applied to assess the proportions of CRS1+2 or CRS3 between gBRCA.
Results
536 women were eligible. Mean age 66 years (range 36–89). 139 had FIGO stage IVB HGSOC. 71% received 3-weekly carboplatin with paclitaxel. Median PFS was 14.4 months (95%CI 13.6–15.4) and OS 38.0 months (95%CI 34.8–42.6) in the overall population. Performance status (0–1 vs. 2–4), cytoreductive surgery (Yes vs. No) and gBRCA status (mutant[MT] vs. wild type[WT]) were predictive (PFS) and prognostic (OS) in the overall population (all P<0.05). 363 women underwent delayed primary surgery (DPS) and had a CRS. Of these, 90% received 3–4 cycles of NACT and 96% had optimal (≤1 cm) cytoreduction. In the NACT-DPS group, MV analysis showed that residual disease (≤1 vs. >1 cm), CRS (3 vs. 1+2) and gBRCA status (MT vs. WT) were predictive (PFS) (all P≤0.02). Proportion testing showed women with gBRCA2 were more likely to have CRS3 vs. CRS1+2 than those with gBRCA1 (P=0.008). Women with gBRCA1 (P=0.075) and gBRCA2 (P=0.078) were not more likely to have CRS3 vs. CRS1+2 then those with WT.
Conclusions
We found a correlation between CRS3 and gBRCA2, but not gBRCA1, in women with FIGO stage IIIC/IV HGSOC treated with NACT-DPS. CRS should be evaluated in a prospective study as a predictor of PARPi efficacy.
Table: 782P
CRS | gBRCA1 | gBRCA2 | WT | PFS, months (95%CI) |
1 | 7 | 1 | 60 | 12.1 (11.5–15.7) |
2 | 19 | 9 | 146 | 15.4 (14.4–16.7) |
1+2 | 26 (84%) | 10 (45%) | 206 (66%) | 14.9 (14.0–16.0) |
3 | 5 (16%) | 12 (55%) | 104 (34%) | 22.8 (20.7–27.9) |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
R.D. Morgan.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
812P - Mental and socioeconomic burden in co-parents and children of patients with endometrial and cervical cancer: A Swedish population-based study
Presenter: Karin Sundström
Session: Poster session 11
814P - Clinical significance of isolated pulmonary recurrence in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer who achieved complete remission after primary treatment
Presenter: Jigeun Yoo
Session: Poster session 11
815P - Clinical outcome of metastatic endometrial carcinoma patients treated with chemotherapy: ENDOVIE, a GINECO national observational cohort study
Presenter: Jerome Alexandre
Session: Poster session 11
816P - Laparoscopic versus open-surgery in FIGO stage II endometrioid endometrium cancers: Is there a prognostic effect?
Presenter: Alain Zeimet
Session: Poster session 11
817P - A systematic review of recruitment of ethnic minorities to RCTs of systemic anti-cancer therapies in gynaecological cancers
Presenter: Luke Steventon
Session: Poster session 11