Abstract 6062
Background
A standardized evaluation approach in oncology is essential to optimize treatment and management of patients. In particular, a medical software designed to provide standard metrics and reports may help the communication among health care professionals, facilitating the decision process. To this aim, a large survey study was conducted across the United Kingdom (UK), Spain (ES) and Italy (IT) exploring existing unmet needs and questioning the way oncological data is tracked in daily routine practice with the aim of offering some ideas for improvement.
Methods
Physicians were enrolled by an independent Market Research Company according to diiferent inclusion criteria: a) 2-35 years in practice; b) ≥50% of practice time in direct patient care; c) involvement in making treatment decisions ; d) involvement in ordering and reviewing tumour assessment reports; e) to be an investigator or author of an oncology clinical trial in the past 5 years.The study was conducted in November-December, 2018.
Results
A total number of 270 physicians (medical oncologists: n = 180, radio-oncologists: n = 90) participated (UK/100, ES/95, IT/75). The vast majority of physicians use Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria in their daily practice (86%). Guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics (iRECIST) and modified RECIST (mRECIST) are also used by between third and a quarter of physicians. Of note, almost half of the physicians indicated that there is a low level of data management in oncology and 2 out of 3 agree that this negatively impacts therapeutic decisions. Over a third of ES physicians believe that there is a low level of data management in oncology and a similar proportion in IT and ES report that it is impacting therapeutic decision making.
Conclusions
Only a third of physicians view their current reporting systems as adequate. All participants agree that any reporting system is in need of a common shared template for radiologists and oncologists. Thus, physicians identify a lack of consistency in diagnostic assessments and delays in receiving the reports as key unmet needs in tumor reporting systems –indicating the need for a streamlined system.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Wehealth Digital Medicine.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5368 - Durvalumab and Paclitaxel Combination for treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer is safe with very promising efficacy
Presenter: Hazem Ghebeh
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1520 - A prospective cohort study on the pharmacokinetics of nivolumab in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell cancer patients
Presenter: Daan Hurkmans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1603 - Safety and clinical activity of subcutaneously (SC) administered anti-PD-1 antibody PF-06801591 in phase I dose-expansion cohorts of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Byoung Cho
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3922 - Development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM): A scale to measure quality of life in cancer patients treated with ICMs
Presenter: Aaron Hansen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2408 - Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as “chemotherapy (Ctx) sensitization” strategy in advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3612 - Validation of progression-free survival (PFS) as surrogate endpoint in randomised trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid cancers
Presenter: Peey Sei Kok
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3827 - Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of weight-based and fixed dose cemiplimab in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies
Presenter: Michael Migden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2120 - A burst of highly differentiated CD4 TL identifies a subset of fast progressors, and correlates with hyperprogressive disease in NSCLC patients treated with ICI
Presenter: Hugo Arasanz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4254 - Nivolumab treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): a French nationwide retrospective cohort (UNIVOC Study)
Presenter: Christos Chouaid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1084 - Dissociated responses in patients with metastatic solid tumors treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Pauline Vaflard
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract