Abstract 3922
Background
Currently cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint modulators (ICMs) have their health related quality of life (HRQOL) measured by general patient reported outcome (PRO) tools such as the EORTC QLQC30 or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). No instrument has been developed specifically for patients treated with ICMs, which may lead to their HRQOL being evaluated inaccurately. The objective of this study was to develop a toxicity subscale PRO instrument for ICM treated patients that would contribute to the measurement of HRQOL.
Methods
Input was collected from a prior systematic review, patients and physicians. Descriptive thematic analysis was used to evaluate the qualitative data obtained from patient focus groups and interviews, which informed the development of an initial list of items that described ICM side effects (SEs) and their impacts upon HRQOL. Physician surveys and interviews informed subsequent item generation/reduction. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with a new set of patients after they completed the toxicity subscale.
Results
Focus groups and individual interviews with 37 ICM-treated patients generated an initial list of 176 items. Following a first round of item reduction that produced a shortened list of 76 items, 16 physicians who care for ICM treated patients were surveyed with a list of 49 patient reported toxicity related unique SEs; and 11 physicians participated in follow up interviews. Informed by the data collected from the physicians, a second round of item reduction produced a list of 25 items that covered a wide range of SEs including but not limited to gastrointestinal, cutaneous, musculoskeletal, respiratory, constitutional, neurological and endocrine. This final list was piloted with 11 patients who confirmed that it was comprehensible and complete.
Conclusions
This 25 item list is the first HRQOL toxicity subscale developed with patient and clinician input for patients treated with ICMs. The subscale will be combined with the FACT-G to form the FACT-ICM and this PRO instrument will undergo further validity testing.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02651831.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre.
Funding
University of Toronto, Strategic Innovation Grant.
Disclosure
A.R. Hansen: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): GSK; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche-Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): MedImmune; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boston Biomedical; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb. P. Bedard: Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech/Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): GlaxoSmithKline; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): SignalChem; Research grant / Funding (institution): PTC Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nektar; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Mersana; Research grant / Funding (institution): Immunomedics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract