Abstract 6062
Background
A standardized evaluation approach in oncology is essential to optimize treatment and management of patients. In particular, a medical software designed to provide standard metrics and reports may help the communication among health care professionals, facilitating the decision process. To this aim, a large survey study was conducted across the United Kingdom (UK), Spain (ES) and Italy (IT) exploring existing unmet needs and questioning the way oncological data is tracked in daily routine practice with the aim of offering some ideas for improvement.
Methods
Physicians were enrolled by an independent Market Research Company according to diiferent inclusion criteria: a) 2-35 years in practice; b) ≥50% of practice time in direct patient care; c) involvement in making treatment decisions ; d) involvement in ordering and reviewing tumour assessment reports; e) to be an investigator or author of an oncology clinical trial in the past 5 years.The study was conducted in November-December, 2018.
Results
A total number of 270 physicians (medical oncologists: n = 180, radio-oncologists: n = 90) participated (UK/100, ES/95, IT/75). The vast majority of physicians use Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria in their daily practice (86%). Guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics (iRECIST) and modified RECIST (mRECIST) are also used by between third and a quarter of physicians. Of note, almost half of the physicians indicated that there is a low level of data management in oncology and 2 out of 3 agree that this negatively impacts therapeutic decisions. Over a third of ES physicians believe that there is a low level of data management in oncology and a similar proportion in IT and ES report that it is impacting therapeutic decision making.
Conclusions
Only a third of physicians view their current reporting systems as adequate. All participants agree that any reporting system is in need of a common shared template for radiologists and oncologists. Thus, physicians identify a lack of consistency in diagnostic assessments and delays in receiving the reports as key unmet needs in tumor reporting systems –indicating the need for a streamlined system.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Wehealth Digital Medicine.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1707 - Clinical utility of precision immunoprofiling and monitoring of the tumor microenvironment using flow cytometry and CyTOF in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with atezolizumab: results from a phase II study for biomarker analysis (EPOC1702)
Presenter: Keisuke Kirita
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3594 - Tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1, IFN-γ signaling identify subgroups of patients (pts) who benefit from durvalumab (D, anti-PDL1) or D and tremelimumab (T, anti-CTLA4) treatment in urothelial bladder cancer (UC)
Presenter: Christophe Massard
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
744 - The decrease of TMB, TNB and HLA expression are the Mechanism of Drug Resistance of NSCLC to immunosuppressive PD-1/PD-l1.
Presenter: Sheng Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2350 - Eosinophilia during treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) predicts succeeding onset of immune-related adverse events (irAEs)
Presenter: Rika Kizawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5930 - A transcriptomic immunologic signature predicts favorable outcome in neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated triple negative breast tumors.
Presenter: Javier Pérez-peña
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6127 - Alterations of TMB and TCR repertoires during Chemotherapy in East Asian lung cancer patients without TKI-related driver gene mutations
Presenter: Lele Song
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1310 - Association of SCFA in gut microbiome and clinical response in solid cancer patients treated with andi-PD-1 antibody.
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2286 - Extracellular matrix and tissue derived metabolites in a liquid biopsy identifies endotypes of metastatic melanoma patients with differential response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment
Presenter: Nicholas Willumsen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4107 - Pathologic scoring of pre-treatment H&E biopsies predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab monotherapy
Presenter: Julie Stein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1291 - PD-L1 expression in uncommon EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and its response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Yun Fan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract