Abstract 6062
Background
A standardized evaluation approach in oncology is essential to optimize treatment and management of patients. In particular, a medical software designed to provide standard metrics and reports may help the communication among health care professionals, facilitating the decision process. To this aim, a large survey study was conducted across the United Kingdom (UK), Spain (ES) and Italy (IT) exploring existing unmet needs and questioning the way oncological data is tracked in daily routine practice with the aim of offering some ideas for improvement.
Methods
Physicians were enrolled by an independent Market Research Company according to diiferent inclusion criteria: a) 2-35 years in practice; b) ≥50% of practice time in direct patient care; c) involvement in making treatment decisions ; d) involvement in ordering and reviewing tumour assessment reports; e) to be an investigator or author of an oncology clinical trial in the past 5 years.The study was conducted in November-December, 2018.
Results
A total number of 270 physicians (medical oncologists: n = 180, radio-oncologists: n = 90) participated (UK/100, ES/95, IT/75). The vast majority of physicians use Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria in their daily practice (86%). Guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics (iRECIST) and modified RECIST (mRECIST) are also used by between third and a quarter of physicians. Of note, almost half of the physicians indicated that there is a low level of data management in oncology and 2 out of 3 agree that this negatively impacts therapeutic decisions. Over a third of ES physicians believe that there is a low level of data management in oncology and a similar proportion in IT and ES report that it is impacting therapeutic decision making.
Conclusions
Only a third of physicians view their current reporting systems as adequate. All participants agree that any reporting system is in need of a common shared template for radiologists and oncologists. Thus, physicians identify a lack of consistency in diagnostic assessments and delays in receiving the reports as key unmet needs in tumor reporting systems –indicating the need for a streamlined system.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Wehealth Digital Medicine.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2171 - CCND1 Amplification Contributes to Immunosuppression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and the Association with a Poor Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Presenter: Chloe Huang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2624 - Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with sensitive genes mutation
Presenter: Hui-Juan Cui
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3494 - Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) kinetics as predictors of outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab (N).
Presenter: Audrey Simonaggio
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3964 - Predictive markers of checkpoint inhibitor activity in adult metastatic solid tumours
Presenter: Alexandra Pender
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3041 - Blood-based TMB (bTMB) correlates with tissue-based TMB (tTMB) in a multi-cancer Phase I IO Cohort
Presenter: Daniel Araujo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3910 - Analysis of Molecular Profile Complexities for Immunotherapy Decision Support
Presenter: Robert Dóczi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4836 - The Role of Tumor Neoantigens in the Differential Response to Immunotherapy (IO) in EGFR and BRAF Mutated Lung Cancers - Quantity or Quality?
Presenter: Katrina Case
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1929 - Impact of previous corticosteroid (CS) exposure on efficacy of Programmed Cell Death-(Ligand) 1 blockade in patients with advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a single Center retrospective analysis
Presenter: Fabrizio Nelli
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2601 - Comparison 18F-FDG-PET/CT criteria for prediction of therapy response and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with Ipilimumab and PD-1 inhibitors
Presenter: Sabrina Vari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3628 - Predictive model for survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with frontline pembrolizumab
Presenter: Xabier Mielgo Rubio
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract